DOJ-OGR-00016944.jpg
500 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
500 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a discussion between a judge, Mr. Everdell, and Mr. Rohrbach of the government. They are collaborating to edit statutory text for a legal document, agreeing to remove language related to foreign commerce and coercion to better fit the evidence of the case. The agreed-upon changes include using ellipses and adding the phrase 'knowingly persuades, induces, or entices'.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, asking questions, and confirming edits to a document.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Proposing edits to statutory text within a document, addressing the court as 'your Honor'.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Speaking on behalf of the government, agreeing to proposed edits to the statutory text.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the government | Government agency |
Mentioned as the party Mr. Rohrbach represents, which agrees with a proposed text edit.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion was held to finalize the wording of statutory text in a legal document. The parties agreed to remove the phrases 'or foreign' and 'or coerces' and add 'knowingly persuades, induces, or entices'.
Southern District Court (inferred)
The Court
Mr. Everdell
Mr. Rohrbach
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the name of the court reporting company, indicating the location of the court.
|
Relationships (3)
Mr. Everdell
→
Professional
→
The Court
Mr. Everdell addresses the court as 'your Honor' and presents proposals for the court's approval.
Mr. Rohrbach
→
Professional
→
The Court
Mr. Rohrbach speaks to the court, representing the government's position on proposed text edits.
Mr. Everdell
→
Professional
→
Mr. Rohrbach
They are attorneys on different sides of a case (Mr. Rohrbach represents 'the government') but are collaborating to finalize the language of a legal document.
Key Quotes (3)
"It would need to be ellipses since this is the statutory text, but that's fine with the government."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Agreeing to the removal of the words 'or foreign' from a line of text on behalf of the government.)
DOJ-OGR-00016944.jpg
Quote #1
"So we'll do, page 19, line 5, it will read, "Travel in interstate... commerce," cutting "or foreign" and replacing with the ellipses."Source
— THE COURT
(Confirming and dictating the agreed-upon edit to the document.)
DOJ-OGR-00016944.jpg
Quote #2
"There is the inclusion of the statutory text "or coerces," and since we don't have any evidence of coercion, our proposal would be to add -- have it read "knowingly persuades, induces, or entices... any individual.""Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Proposing an edit to the text to remove language about coercion and replace it with language that aligns with the case's evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00016944.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,207 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 765 Filed 08/10/22 Page 18 of 95
LCI1MAX1
2756
1
THE COURT: Okay. Have we made it to 17?
2
MR. EVERDELL: We've made it to 19, in fact.
3
THE COURT: 19. Wow. Progress.
4
MR. EVERDELL: Page 19 is the next one, your Honor.
5
THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead.
6
MR. EVERDELL: First, on line 5, there's another "or
7
foreign," which we can omit.
8
THE COURT: Okay. Let me just look.
9
Yeah. Okay.
10
MR. ROHRBACH: It would need to be ellipses since this
11
is the statutory text, but that's fine with the government.
12
THE COURT: So we'll do, page 19, line 5, it will
13
read, "Travel in interstate... commerce," cutting "or foreign"
14
and replacing with the ellipses.
15
Okay. Next page.
16
MR. EVERDELL: Same page, your Honor, line 4.
17
Don't worry. I tried to be efficient about this.
18
We'll go quickly.
19
THE COURT: That's fine.
20
MR. EVERDELL: Line 4. There is the inclusion of the
21
statutory text "or coerces," and since we don't have any
22
evidence of coercion, our proposal would be to add -- have it
23
read "knowingly persuades, induces, or entices... any
24
individual."
25
THE COURT: Or in brackets.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016944
LCI1MAX1
2756
1
THE COURT: Okay. Have we made it to 17?
2
MR. EVERDELL: We've made it to 19, in fact.
3
THE COURT: 19. Wow. Progress.
4
MR. EVERDELL: Page 19 is the next one, your Honor.
5
THE COURT: Okay. Go ahead.
6
MR. EVERDELL: First, on line 5, there's another "or
7
foreign," which we can omit.
8
THE COURT: Okay. Let me just look.
9
Yeah. Okay.
10
MR. ROHRBACH: It would need to be ellipses since this
11
is the statutory text, but that's fine with the government.
12
THE COURT: So we'll do, page 19, line 5, it will
13
read, "Travel in interstate... commerce," cutting "or foreign"
14
and replacing with the ellipses.
15
Okay. Next page.
16
MR. EVERDELL: Same page, your Honor, line 4.
17
Don't worry. I tried to be efficient about this.
18
We'll go quickly.
19
THE COURT: That's fine.
20
MR. EVERDELL: Line 4. There is the inclusion of the
21
statutory text "or coerces," and since we don't have any
22
evidence of coercion, our proposal would be to add -- have it
23
read "knowingly persuades, induces, or entices... any
24
individual."
25
THE COURT: Or in brackets.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016944
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document