HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014051.jpg

1.66 MB

Extraction Summary

1
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal analysis / law review article (page 72) submitted as house oversight exhibit
File Size: 1.66 MB
Summary

This document is page 72 of a legal analysis (likely by Paul Cassell) labeled with a House Oversight Bates number. It argues that the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) applies during the investigative phase of a case, before formal charges are filed. The text cites specific statutory language regarding 'detection' and 'investigation' obligations of the DOJ and venue provisions for pre-prosecution situations to support this interpretation.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Cassell Author
Listed in the header 'Cassell et al.' (Likely Paul Cassell, representing Epstein victims)

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Department of Justice
Mentioned regarding obligations to victims under CVRA
Congress
Mentioned as the body that envisioned the law's application
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014051)

Locations (2)

Location Context
Jurisdiction of the agencies mentioned
Venue for asserting rights

Relationships (1)

Victims Legal Obligation Department of Justice
Text states DOJ employees must make best efforts to accord rights to victims during detection and investigation.

Key Quotes (3)

"Congress thus directly envisioned the victims’ rights law to apply during the “detection” and “investigation” phases of criminal cases."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014051.jpg
Quote #1
"For all these reasons, the CVRA’s plain language indicates that the victims have protected rights under the Act even before charges are filed."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014051.jpg
Quote #2
"The CVRA specifically directs that '[o]fficers and employees of the Department of Justice... engaged in the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime shall make their best efforts to see that crime victims are notified of, and accorded, the rights described in [the CVRA].'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014051.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,841 characters)

72 CASSELL ET AL. [Vol. 104]
respect for the victim’s dignity and privacy,”57 a broad right that does not appear to be directly linked to a filed court case. Similarly, the CVRA promises victims the “reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case.”58 In this section, the CVRA’s drafters appear to have eschewed a reference to court proceedings, using a broader term instead. Of course, a “case” can refer both to a judicial case before a court and an investigative case pursued by a law enforcement officer. It is common usage to say such things as, “The police officer investigated and solved the case.” Dictionary definitions of the word “case” support this varied interpretation.59
If there remained any doubts about whether the CVRA applies during the investigative part of the criminal justice process, two other provisions in the CVRA resolve them. The CVRA specifically directs that “[o]fficers and employees of the Department of Justice and other departments and agencies of the United States engaged in the detection, investigation, or prosecution of crime shall make their best efforts to see that crime victims are notified of, and accorded, the rights described in [the CVRA].”60 Of course, there would be no reason to direct that agencies involved in the “detection” and “investigation” of crime have CVRA obligations if the Act did not extend to pre-charging situations. Congress thus directly envisioned the victims’ rights law to apply during the “detection” and “investigation” phases of criminal cases.
Similarly, the CVRA’s venue provision instructs that crime victims who seek to assert rights in pre-charging situations should proceed in the court where the crime was committed: “The rights described in subsection (a) [of the CVRA] shall be asserted in the district court in which a defendant is being prosecuted for the crime or, if no prosecution is underway, in the district court in the district in which the crime occurred.”61 Here again, it is hard to see why this provision would be necessary unless the CVRA applies before the formal filing of charges.
For all these reasons, the CVRA’s plain language indicates that the victims have protected rights under the Act even before charges are filed.
____________________
57 Id. § 3771(a)(8).
58 Id. § 3771(a)(5) (emphasis added).
59 See, e.g., BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY 243–44 (9th ed. 2009) (defining, among the definitions of “case,” a “test case” as “[a] criminal investigation” as in “the Manson case”); WEBSTER’S THIRD NEW INTERNATIONAL DICTIONARY OF THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE UNABRIDGED 345 (1993) (defining “case” as “a circumstance or situation (as a crime) requiring investigation or action by the police or other agency”).
60 18 U.S.C. § 3771(c)(1) (emphasis added).
61 Id. § 3771(d)(3) (emphasis added).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014051

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document