EFTA00031319.pdf
19.3 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email
File Size:
19.3 KB
Summary
An email from March 6, 2019, covering a draft status memo regarding 'JE' (likely Jeffrey Epstein) intended for the ODAG (Office of the Deputy Attorney General). The sender seeks feedback on the document, noting its length exceeds the 'chiefs' recommendation due to necessary legal analysis.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| JE | Subject of Memo |
Initials in attachment filename '2019-03-05,_JE,_status_memo_to_ODAG.docx', likely referring to Jeffrey Epstein
|
| Redacted Sender | Author |
Sender of the email asking for feedback on a status memo
|
| Redacted Recipient | Reviewer |
Recipient of the email
|
| Chiefs | Supervisors |
Mentioned in body as providing guidance on page length
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| ODAG |
Office of the Deputy Attorney General (implied by attachment filename 'to_ODAG')
|
Relationships (1)
Sender asking recipient for thoughts/suggestions on a draft work product.
Key Quotes (2)
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (420 characters)
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: status memo draft
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 02:22:10 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: 2019-03-05,_JE,_status_memo_to_ODAG.docx
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: status memo draft
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2019 02:22:10 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: 2019-03-05,_JE,_status_memo_to_ODAG.docx
Thoughts? It’s a little on the long side (chiefs said ~3 pages was fine) just due to the legal analysis, but they can always cut that down. Anyway I’ve never done one of these in particular before so very happy for suggestions. Thanks!
EFTA00031319
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document