This document is a page from a court transcript dated July 24, 2019. An unidentified speaker, likely an attorney, explains the complexities of a client's sex offender registration obligations under the federal SORNA statute due to having multiple residences in states like Florida and New Mexico. The speaker notes that while efforts were made to comply, authorities in New Mexico ultimately determined that registration was not required, and the court acknowledges understanding the situation.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unnamed individual ('he') | Subject of discussion |
An individual with multiple residences who tasked lawyers to handle his registration obligations in different states ...
|
| lawyers | Legal representative |
Tasked by the subject ('he') to go to registration boards in the states where he had residence.
|
| counsel | Legal representative |
Mentioned by the court as potentially having meetings or filing applications in different jurisdictions.
|
| THE COURT | Judicial authority |
A speaker in the transcript, responding to the explanation provided.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency.
|
| administrative agency | government agency |
Mentioned as the entity that would be prompted to respond to an application or letter filed by counsel.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in relation to the 'Florida state sentence'.
|
|
|
A state where the individual had a residence and where the ultimate decision was made that he did not need to register.
|
|
|
Mentioned as a place the individual travels to, and which informs other locations of his travel.
|
"New Mexico said, you don't need to register."Source
"THE COURT: I got it."Source
"I think I sort of assumed something like that, that counsel in different jurisdictions would have had a meeting or filed an application or a letter or something or rather causing the administrative agency to respond."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,566 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document