DOJ-OGR-00016476.jpg
560 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
5
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
560 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and two attorneys, Ms. Menninger and Ms. Sternheim, about scheduling the remainder of a trial. They discuss the timeline for the defense case, a charging conference, and closing arguments, which are projected for the 16th through the 21st of an unspecified month. Ms. Sternheim raises a concern about the jury having to deliberate immediately before the Christmas holiday.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, setting the trial schedule.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, responding to the Court.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, discussing the trial schedule and expressing concerns about jury deliberation near Christmas.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (5 events)
Discussion of the trial schedule. The defense case is set to begin on the 16th.
Courtroom
Closing arguments are anticipated for the 20th or 21st.
Courtroom
Christmas holiday is mentioned as a factor in scheduling jury deliberations.
Thanksgiving is mentioned in comparison to the upcoming Christmas holiday.
Relationships (2)
Ms. Menninger addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and participates in the scheduling discussion, indicating a professional attorney-judge relationship in a legal proceeding.
Ms. Sternheim addresses the Court as 'Judge' and negotiates the trial schedule, indicating a professional attorney-judge relationship in a legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (3)
"The defense case begins on the 16th."Source
— THE COURT
(Establishing the start date for the next phase of the trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00016476.jpg
Quote #1
"if the defense were to rest on the 17th, for example, then I will expect closings, absent a rebuttal case, on the 20th."Source
— THE COURT
(Outlining the expected timeline for closing arguments based on when the defense rests its case.)
DOJ-OGR-00016476.jpg
Quote #2
"Judge, we would like to at least discuss our concerns about a jury deliberating one day prior to a Christmas holiday."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Raising an issue about the timing of jury deliberations in relation to the holiday schedule.)
DOJ-OGR-00016476.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,421 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 260 of 267 2288
LCAVMAX8
LCAVMAX8
1 THE COURT: Okay.
2 MS. MENNINGER: I think so, your Honor.
3 THE COURT: All right. I'm just looking at the
4 calendar. The defense case begins on the 16th. We have the
5 16th, the 17th. We'll do the charging conference on the 18th,
6 if the defense case continues into the next week.
7 But let me just encourage -- given this break that
8 we're going on and -- here's just the one thing I want to say.
9 I'll hear from you, but I want -- if the defense were to rest
10 on the 17th, for example, then I will expect closings, absent a
11 rebuttal case, on the 20th. Everybody agree with that?
12 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes, Judge.
13 But I think it's highly unlikely that we will complete
14 it on Friday, and I would ask the Court to take that into
15 consideration.
16 THE COURT: Okay. So let's say you rest on the 20th,
17 Ms. Sternheim.
18 MS. STERNHEIM: That is our anticipation.
19 THE COURT: Okay. So then we would anticipate
20 closings on the 21st; correct?
21 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, we would like to at least
22 discuss our concerns about a jury deliberating one day prior to
23 a Christmas holiday. I think that given that, as was
24 Thanksgiving, Christmas this year is particularly celebratory
25 since people were not able to do that last year.
2 MS. MENNINGER: I think so, your Honor.
3 THE COURT: All right. I'm just looking at the
4 calendar. The defense case begins on the 16th. We have the
5 16th, the 17th. We'll do the charging conference on the 18th,
6 if the defense case continues into the next week.
7 But let me just encourage -- given this break that
8 we're going on and -- here's just the one thing I want to say.
9 I'll hear from you, but I want -- if the defense were to rest
10 on the 17th, for example, then I will expect closings, absent a
11 rebuttal case, on the 20th. Everybody agree with that?
12 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes, Judge.
13 But I think it's highly unlikely that we will complete
14 it on Friday, and I would ask the Court to take that into
15 consideration.
16 THE COURT: Okay. So let's say you rest on the 20th,
17 Ms. Sternheim.
18 MS. STERNHEIM: That is our anticipation.
19 THE COURT: Okay. So then we would anticipate
20 closings on the 21st; correct?
21 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, we would like to at least
22 discuss our concerns about a jury deliberating one day prior to
23 a Christmas holiday. I think that given that, as was
24 Thanksgiving, Christmas this year is particularly celebratory
25 since people were not able to do that last year.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016476
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document