This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Sternheim before a judge. The defense objects to the handling of 'exhibit 309,' a photograph, claiming it impairs their ability to cross-examine a witness. Ms. Moe counters that the defense was already aware of the photo and its identification by a witness named Kate from an interview conducted in September, and thus had the opportunity to address it.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Meder |
Mentioned in the header, indicating the subject of the direct examination.
|
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, arguing against an objection from the defense.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, presiding over the proceedings and ruling on objections.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, presumably representing the defense and making an objection.
|
| Kate | Interviewee/Witness |
A person who was shown a photograph (exhibit 309) during an interview in September and identified herself in it.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
"Your Honor, the defense has not been compromised in any way. I want to unpack the facts here --"Source
"I take each objection as it comes. You make your record. It doesn't help analyze it to just talk about larger issues, which I don't know what you're talking about."Source
"Your objection is that by not putting it in when the witness is on the stand, you can't cross examine the witness about the context of the photo. Do I have it right?"Source
"So, as defense counsel knows, we showed this photograph to Kate during an interview in September of this year. She identified that as herself and remembered it. Defense counsel has had that note."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,454 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document