DOJ-OGR-00015006.jpg
589 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
589 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from January 15, 2025, detailing a cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio. The questioning focuses on the conclusion and methodology of a study. The judge interrupts the proceedings to call for a 30-minute lunch recess and advises the attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, to focus his questioning more on underlying 'Daubert questions' rather than points for a jury to make better use of the court's time.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Witness |
Mentioned in the header, undergoing cross-examination.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker who calls for a recess and addresses Mr. Pagliuca.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Addressed by the court and responds. He is conducting the cross-examination.
|
| Unnamed author | Author of a study |
Mentioned in the context of a study being discussed during the cross-examination.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2025-01-15
Cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio regarding a study.
Courtroom
2025-01-15
The court took a 30-minute luncheon recess at 12:55, scheduled to resume at 1:25.
Courtroom
Relationships (1)
The judge (THE COURT) gives direct instructions and legal advice to the attorney (Mr. Pagliuca) regarding the conduct of his cross-examination during a court proceeding.
Key Quotes (2)
"I do want to encourage you, Mr. Pagliuca, to focus your cross less on what you might do in front of a jury -- because you are ably demonstrating to me so far that the points you made in your papers are cross-examination points -- so to the extent there are any of the opinions you want to focus on the underlying Daubert questions -- and you did a little bit at the end here -- the time would be much more effectively used."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge is advising attorney Mr. Pagliuca on how to conduct his cross-examination more effectively before calling for a lunch recess.)
DOJ-OGR-00015006.jpg
Quote #1
"Understood, your Honor."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Responding to the judge's advice.)
DOJ-OGR-00015006.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,505 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 130 of 158 130
LBAGmax4
Rocchio - Cross
LBAGmax4
Rocchio - Cross
1 conclusion of the study, no.
2 Q. Well, are you just saying you ignore the conclusion of the
3 author who did this study because you don't agree with it?
4 A. I'm not saying this is the conclusion. The purpose of the
5 study -- a conclusion generally refers to the concluding
6 comments summarizing the main findings of the study. So this
7 is actually not part of her -- their conclusion. It's part of
8 their rationale for why this particular piece of research is
9 important and needed in the field.
10 Q. So let's go through the methodology of this particular
11 study as well.
12 THE COURT: We'll take about a 20-minute, 30-minute
13 break for lunch. It's 12:55, I think we probably need 30
14 minutes, just logistically, so we'll resume at 1:25.
15 I do want to encourage you, Mr. Pagliuca, to focus
16 your cross less on what you might do in front of a jury --
17 because you are ably demonstrating to me so far that the points
18 you made in your papers are cross-examination points -- so to
19 the extent there are any of the opinions you want to focus on
20 the underlying Daubert questions -- and you did a little bit at
21 the end here -- the time would be much more effectively used.
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: Understood, your Honor.
23 THE COURT: Thank you. We'll resume in 30 minutes.
24 (Luncheon recess)
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00015006
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document