DOJ-OGR-00013843.jpg
547 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
547 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a scheduling discussion between two attorneys, Mr. Everdell and Ms. Moe, and the judge. The conversation centers on setting deadlines for disclosing a witness list and filing a related application, with proposed dates of Monday, Wednesday, and Thursday being considered. Mr. Everdell highlights the urgency of the matter due to concerns among the witnesses involved.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, likely representing the defense, discussing scheduling for a witness list and submis...
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, addressed as 'Your Honor', making decisions on scheduling.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, likely representing the government, discussing scheduling.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A court hearing was held to discuss scheduling matters related to a witness list and a subsequent application.
Courtroom (unspecified)
Relationships (3)
Mr. Everdell addresses The Court as 'Your Honor' and makes procedural suggestions during a legal proceeding.
Ms. Moe addresses The Court as 'Your Honor' and discusses scheduling options.
They are opposing counsel in a court case, discussing scheduling for 'the defense' and 'the government'.
Key Quotes (3)
"Your Honor, if I can make a suggestion, I think it makes the most sense to do this after we have disclosed the witness list and then we can confer."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Proposing a sequence of events for handling the witness list.)
DOJ-OGR-00013843.jpg
Quote #1
"I think if we can do it by Monday, that would be fine for the defense, if that works for the government."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Suggesting a deadline for a submission.)
DOJ-OGR-00013843.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, I'm sorry to do this, but I think the concern is high enough among some of these witnesses that -- you know, that they need an answer on this issue sooner"Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Expressing urgency for a decision on behalf of witnesses.)
DOJ-OGR-00013843.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,303 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 252 of 267
LCAVMAX8
LCAVMAX8
talking about.
MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, if I can make a suggestion,
I think it makes the most sense to do this after we have
disclosed the witness list and then we can confer.
I think it makes the most sense to do this after we have
disclosed the witness list and then we can confer.
THE COURT: Right. So do that. And then confer and
then you tell me, Mr. Everdell, when would you like to put
in --
then you tell me, Mr. Everdell, when would you like to put
in --
MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor.
I think if we can do it by Monday, that would be fine
for the defense, if that works for the government.
for the defense, if that works for the government.
THE COURT: So Monday. If you're in agreement, you'll
put in a submission. If you're in disagreement, the defense
will move on Monday and I'll hear from the government on --
put in a submission. If you're in disagreement, the defense
will move on Monday and I'll hear from the government on --
MS. MOE: Wednesday, your Honor?
THE COURT: So I suppose we might be looking at this
application with respect to witnesses on Thursday.
application with respect to witnesses on Thursday.
MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
If I could just have one moment to confer on timing.
THE COURT: Yes.
MS. MOE: Your Honor, would Wednesday at noon be
acceptable? If the Court would like additional time --
acceptable? If the Court would like additional time --
THE COURT: That's fine.
MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I'm sorry to do this, but I
think the concern is high enough among some of these witnesses
that -- you know, that they need an answer on this issue sooner
think the concern is high enough among some of these witnesses
that -- you know, that they need an answer on this issue sooner
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013843
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document