DOJ-OGR-00014898.jpg

555 KB

Extraction Summary

1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 555 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on January 15, 2025, from the direct examination of a witness named Rocchio. Rocchio explains the peer-review process for professional presentations, comparing it to academic publication standards, and confirms that the majority of their presentations have focused on trauma psychology and interpersonal violence.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Rocchio Witness
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a direct examination ('Rocchio - Direct') and is the individual providing a...

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the document as the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.

Timeline (1 events)

2025-01-15
A witness, Rocchio, is questioned about the nature and peer-review process of their professional presentations, and confirms the topics included trauma psychology and interpersonal violence.
Rocchio Unnamed Questioner

Relationships (1)

Unnamed Questioner Professional Rocchio
The document is a transcript of a formal direct examination in a legal case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), where an unnamed individual questions the witness, Rocchio.

Key Quotes (2)

"So it's the same peer-review process or it's analogous to the process I described for publication."
Source
— A. (Rocchio) (Explaining the meaning of a peer-reviewed professional presentation.)
DOJ-OGR-00014898.jpg
Quote #1
"The vast majority of them have, yes."
Source
— A. (Rocchio) (Responding to a question about whether their professional presentations focused on trauma psychology or interpersonal violence.)
DOJ-OGR-00014898.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,387 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 22 of 158 22
LBAAMAX1ps Rocchio - Direct
1 conference, where I'm providing either information and
2 knowledge in the course of a presentation or I'm conducting a
3 workshop, either by myself or as part of a symposium, a panel
4 of presenters, on a given topic.
5 Q. Are your professional presentations peer reviewed?
6 A. Yes, they are.
7 Q. What does it mean for a professional presentation to be
8 peer reviewed?
9 A. So it's the same peer-review process or it's analogous to
10 the process I described for publication. In other words,
11 people will submit, I would submit a presentation. There's a
12 call for proposals. I would provide a proposal of what it is I
13 would like to present to the program coordinator. They
14 typically would have a team of individuals who then review all
15 of the submissions and rate them. And then they would select
16 those that they feel are most relevant and worthy and
17 professional to present.
18 Q. Focus on page 7 of Government Exhibit 1, have any of your
19 professional presentations focused on trauma psychology or
20 interpersonal violence?
21 A. The vast majority of them have, yes.
22 Q. Then turning to pages 7 and 8, have you given any invited
23 addresses?
24 A. I have.
25 Q. What are invited addresses?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014898

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document