DOJ-OGR-00018418.jpg

446 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 446 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate by an attorney, Ms. Sternheim. The questioning concerns Kate's filmography, referencing specific numbered items on a list and the IMDB system. An objection for lack of foundation is made by another attorney, Ms. Pomerantz, which the court sustains.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Kate Witness
Subject of a cross-examination, being questioned about her involvement in movies.
THE COURT Judge
Presiding over the legal proceeding, ruling on objections.
MS. STERNHEIM Attorney
Conducting the cross-examination of the witness, Kate.
MS. POMERANTZ Attorney
Making an objection during the cross-examination.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
IMDB database/company
Mentioned as a system for listing movie productions, referred to as 'IMBD system' and 'IMDB'.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Cross-examination of a witness named Kate regarding her involvement in movies listed on a document and potentially on IMDB.
Southern District Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied location from the name of the court reporting company, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'

Relationships (4)

MS. STERNHEIM professional Kate
Ms. Sternheim is conducting a cross-examination of Kate, who is a witness.
MS. POMERANTZ professional MS. STERNHEIM
They are opposing counsel in a court proceeding, with Ms. Pomerantz objecting to Ms. Sternheim's line of questioning.
THE COURT professional MS. STERNHEIM
The Court is presiding over the proceeding where Ms. Sternheim is an attorney, and rules on an objection related to her questioning.
THE COURT professional MS. POMERANTZ
The Court is presiding over the proceeding where Ms. Pomerantz is an attorney, and sustains her objection.

Key Quotes (4)

"Objection, your Honor."
Source
— MS. POMERANTZ (Objecting to a question asked by Ms. Sternheim.)
DOJ-OGR-00018418.jpg
Quote #1
"Grounds?"
Source
— THE COURT (Asking for the legal basis of the objection.)
DOJ-OGR-00018418.jpg
Quote #2
"Foundation."
Source
— MS. POMERANTZ (Stating the legal grounds for the objection.)
DOJ-OGR-00018418.jpg
Quote #3
"Sustained."
Source
— THE COURT (Upholding the objection made by Ms. Pomerantz.)
DOJ-OGR-00018418.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,036 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 81 of 261 1242
LC6Cmax3 Kate - cross
1 do have paper copies. May I hand them up?
2 THE COURT: You may.
3 MS. STERNHEIM: I apologize about that.
4 Q. I'm just going to ask you to take a look at that list and
5 I'm going to ask you to look at number 21.
6 A. Yes.
7 Q. Is that a movie that you were in?
8 A. No.
9 Q. No? Number 3, is that a movie that you were in?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. And number 29, is that a movie that you were in?
12 A. No, I don't know what that movie is.
13 Q. Are you familiar with the IMBD system?
14 A. IMDB?
15 Q. Yes. I apologize.
16 A. Yes.
17 Q. And if those were listed in your IMDB, would those indicate
18 that you were involved with those productions?
19 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
20 THE COURT: Grounds?
21 MS. POMERANTZ: Foundation.
22 THE COURT: Sustained.
23 Q. Do you look at your listings to see whether they are
24 accurate or not?
25 A. No.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018418

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document