This document is a digital forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation occurring on May 23, 2019, between an account associated with 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (user 'jee', likely Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation involves the sharing of a political news article about Nancy Pelosi and Trump, followed by 'jee' offering strategic advice regarding 'DB papers' (likely Deutsche Bank), political positioning ('china not trump'), and branding. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| jee | Participant/Account Owner |
User account name found in file path 'Users\jee'. Associated with email 'jeeitunes@gmail.com'. Likely Jeffrey Epstein.
|
| jeeitunes@gmail.com | Sender |
Email address associated with the participant 'jee'. Sends messages discussing political strategy.
|
| [REDACTED] | Participant |
The other party in the chat. Name and Presentity ID are redacted.
|
| Nancy Pelosi | Subject |
Mentioned in the URL shared by the redacted sender.
|
| Trump | Subject |
Mentioned in the URL shared and in the text message regarding policy ('china not trump').
|
| Tom Friedman | Subject |
Mentioned in text message ('tom friedman like allies'). Likely referring to the journalist.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Daily Beast |
Source of the news article link shared in the chat.
|
|
| DB |
Mentioned in text 'get the DB papers'. Likely refers to Deutsche Bank.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Inferred from the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027722'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in text 'china not trump'.
|
|
|
German spelling for Germany. Mentioned in text 'less of deutshland'.
|
|
|
Mentioned in text 'more of homeland'.
|
"60 days after they get the DB papers."Source
"I think you have positioned yourself perfectly. policy not individuals."Source
"china not trump"Source
"sovereignty not sovereign"Source
"tom friedman like allies"Source
"less of deutshland more of homeland"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,368 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document