HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027722.jpg

986 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
6
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Digital forensic extraction / imessage log
File Size: 986 KB
Summary

This document is a digital forensic extraction of an iMessage conversation occurring on May 23, 2019, between an account associated with 'jeeitunes@gmail.com' (user 'jee', likely Jeffrey Epstein) and a redacted individual. The conversation involves the sharing of a political news article about Nancy Pelosi and Trump, followed by 'jee' offering strategic advice regarding 'DB papers' (likely Deutsche Bank), political positioning ('china not trump'), and branding. The document originates from a House Oversight Committee investigation.

People (6)

Name Role Context
jee Participant/Account Owner
User account name found in file path 'Users\jee'. Associated with email 'jeeitunes@gmail.com'. Likely Jeffrey Epstein.
jeeitunes@gmail.com Sender
Email address associated with the participant 'jee'. Sends messages discussing political strategy.
[REDACTED] Participant
The other party in the chat. Name and Presentity ID are redacted.
Nancy Pelosi Subject
Mentioned in the URL shared by the redacted sender.
Trump Subject
Mentioned in the URL shared and in the text message regarding policy ('china not trump').
Tom Friedman Subject
Mentioned in text message ('tom friedman like allies'). Likely referring to the journalist.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The Daily Beast
Source of the news article link shared in the chat.
DB
Mentioned in text 'get the DB papers'. Likely refers to Deutsche Bank.
House Oversight Committee
Inferred from the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027722'.

Locations (3)

Location Context
Mentioned in text 'china not trump'.
German spelling for Germany. Mentioned in text 'less of deutshland'.
Mentioned in text 'more of homeland'.

Relationships (1)

jeeitunes@gmail.com Advisor/Confidant [REDACTED]
Sender 'jee' is offering strategic advice on branding and political positioning ('positioned yourself perfectly', 'your brand with tweaking').

Key Quotes (6)

"60 days after they get the DB papers."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027722.jpg
Quote #1
"I think you have positioned yourself perfectly. policy not individuals."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027722.jpg
Quote #2
"china not trump"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027722.jpg
Quote #3
"sovereignty not sovereign"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027722.jpg
Quote #4
"tom friedman like allies"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027722.jpg
Quote #5
"less of deutshland more of homeland"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027722.jpg
Quote #6

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,368 characters)

Source Entry: H\Macintosh HD\root\Users\jee\Library\Messages\Archive\2019-06-01\[REDACTED]
on 2019-05-31 at 20.09.22.ichat
Service: iMessage
Start Time: 05/23/19 03:21:07 AM (580299667)
End Time: 06/01/19 09:50:02 AM (581100602)
Last Message ID: 30036
Chat Room:
Participants: jee, [REDACTED]
Presentity IDs: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com, [REDACTED]
Messages -
Sender: [REDACTED]
Time: 05/23/19 03:21:07 AM (580299667)
Flags: 1126401
Is Read: Yes
Is Invitation: No
GUID: 1FB1D854-A563-4238-B200-EA41FEEABCCF
Message: https://www.thedailybeast.com/nancy-pelosi-to-impatient-democrats-weve-got-
trump-on-the-ropes?ref=home
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
Time: 05/23/19 04:15:48 AM (580302948)
Flags: 1085445
Is Read: No
Is Invitation: No
GUID: E439ADEF-F43F-4BFB-8B5D-52CEE26D1420
Message: 60 days after they get the DB papers. oy I think you have positioned
yourself perfectly. policy not individuals. . china not trump. . . sovereignty
not sovereign
Sender: e:jeeitunes@gmail.com
Time: 05/23/19 04:17:14 AM (580303034)
Flags: 1085445
Is Read: No
Is Invitation: No
GUID: EAFA727B-5D16-4355-A8A9-C357A5646573
Message: your brand with tweaking . tom friedman like allies. all good. less of
deutshland more of homeland
Sender: [REDACTED]
Time: 05/23/19 06:28:49 AM (580310929)
Flags: 1060865
Is Read: Yes
Is Invitation: No
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_027722

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document