DOJ-OGR-00022011.jpg
585 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
6
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
585 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a hearing on February 10, 2020, concerning trial scheduling. An attorney argues against a lengthy adjournment, considering the trial schedule of a Mr. Foy. After attorney Ms. Lonergan estimates the trial will last less than a week, the judge sets the trial date for June 8 and establishes deadlines for a motion to dismiss for March and April.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Foy |
Mentioned in the context of his trial schedule, specifically a July trial, which impacts the scheduling of the curren...
|
|
| MS. LONERGAN | Attorney |
Addresses the court regarding the expected length of the trial.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Asks about the trial length and sets the dates for the trial and related motions.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (6 events)
2020-02-10
A court hearing was held where trial scheduling was discussed, as documented in this transcript filed on this date.
Relationships (2)
Ms. Lonergan addresses the court formally as 'Your Honor' in a legal proceeding.
The discussion implies a professional connection, as the scheduling of the current trial is being considered in relation to Mr. Foy's separate July trial. Ms. Lonergan is an attorney involved in the proceedings.
Key Quotes (2)
"Your Honor, if this trial is confined to that 14-hour time period, setting aside jury selection, I can't imagine it lasting more than a week."Source
— MS. LONERGAN
(Responding to the court's question about the expected length of the trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00022011.jpg
Quote #1
"The trial is set for June 8. With respect to the motion to dismiss, the motion is due on March 9, opposition is due by April 6, and the reply is due on April 20."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge's ruling on the schedule for the trial and related motions.)
DOJ-OGR-00022011.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,489 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 26 Filed 02/10/20 Page 8 of 15
klu2NoeC kjc
klu2NoeC kjc
1 statements and interview additional -- interview those
2 witnesses, that can't possibly weigh in favor of an adjournment
3 when in fact the defense counsel has so much more time with
4 those materials than they would in a typical trial schedule
5 where they might have those materials just a few weeks before
6 trial, your Honor.
7 So for those reasons, we think that we are hard
8 pressed to identify areas of additional investigation that
9 would touch on the 14-hour time period that is going to be at
10 issue in this trial; and so, for those reasons, while we agree
11 that a short adjournment is warranted, that six months is not
12 required. We do understand of course that that may be
13 difficult with Mr. Foy's trial schedule with having the July
14 trial, but it seems like there may be a possibility of putting
15 this trial before Mr. Foy's July trial and still giving him
16 sufficient time to prepare for both.
17 THE COURT: And how long do you expect this trial to
18 go?
19 MS. LONERGAN: Your Honor, if this trial is confined
20 to that 14-hour time period, setting aside jury selection, I
21 can't imagine it lasting more than a week.
22 THE COURT: Okay. The trial is set for June 8.
23 With respect to the motion to dismiss, the motion is
24 due on March 9, opposition is due by April 6, and the reply is
25 due on April 20.
2 witnesses, that can't possibly weigh in favor of an adjournment
3 when in fact the defense counsel has so much more time with
4 those materials than they would in a typical trial schedule
5 where they might have those materials just a few weeks before
6 trial, your Honor.
7 So for those reasons, we think that we are hard
8 pressed to identify areas of additional investigation that
9 would touch on the 14-hour time period that is going to be at
10 issue in this trial; and so, for those reasons, while we agree
11 that a short adjournment is warranted, that six months is not
12 required. We do understand of course that that may be
13 difficult with Mr. Foy's trial schedule with having the July
14 trial, but it seems like there may be a possibility of putting
15 this trial before Mr. Foy's July trial and still giving him
16 sufficient time to prepare for both.
17 THE COURT: And how long do you expect this trial to
18 go?
19 MS. LONERGAN: Your Honor, if this trial is confined
20 to that 14-hour time period, setting aside jury selection, I
21 can't imagine it lasting more than a week.
22 THE COURT: Okay. The trial is set for June 8.
23 With respect to the motion to dismiss, the motion is
24 due on March 9, opposition is due by April 6, and the reply is
25 due on April 20.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00022011
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document