HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017309.jpg
498 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal report / memorandum / congressional production
File Size:
498 KB
Summary
This document page, stamped for House Oversight production, outlines a legal victory regarding former Ukrainian President Kuchma. The author details how they proved that recordings used as evidence were handled unlawfully and tampered with, leading the court to rule them inadmissible and resulting in the prosecution being dropped.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| President Kuchma | Defendant / Former President of Ukraine |
Subject of a criminal case where prosecution was dropped due to inadmissible recording evidence.
|
| We | Legal Counsel / Defense Team |
The authors of the report who successfully argued against the admissibility of evidence.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
|
| Ukrainian Court |
Ruled that the recordings could not be used.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Prior to 4.2.12
Court ruling declaring recordings inadmissible against President Kuchma.
Ukraine
President Kuchma
Defense Team
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction mentioned ('Ukrainian law').
|
Relationships (1)
Text describes the defense's actions securing a victory for Kuchma.
Key Quotes (2)
"The end result was that the court ruled that the recordings could not be used against President Kuchma in any criminal case and the prosecution was dropped."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017309.jpg
Quote #1
"We also established that the recording device and the recording had been repeatedly removed from the chain of custody, thereby enabling the tampering to be accomplished."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017309.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (472 characters)
4.2.12
WC: 191694
WC: 191694
We also established that the recording device and the recording had been repeatedly removed from the chain of custody, thereby enabling the tampering to be accomplished. Finally, we proved that under Ukrainian law, the recordings had been made and handled unlawfully. The end result was that the court ruled that the recordings could not be used against President Kuchma in any criminal case and the prosecution was dropped.
222
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017309
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document