DOJ-OGR-00016622.jpg
550 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
550 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and several lawyers (Rohrbach, Sternheim, Pomerantz) regarding procedural matters. The discussion focuses on narrowing the scope of an affidavit to a few paragraphs and determining the schedule for the remainder of the day's proceedings. Logistical issues are raised, including arranging a Webex for a 'Mr. Hamilton' and estimating the time required for a 'Professor Loftus'.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Legal Counsel |
Speaker in the transcript, appears to be representing the defense.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the legal proceeding.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Legal Counsel |
Speaker in the transcript, addresses the judge and discusses logistics.
|
| Mr. Hamilton |
Mentioned by Ms. Sternheim regarding his physical ability to participate via Webex.
|
|
| MS. POMERANTZ | Legal Counsel |
Speaker in the transcript, states she has nothing further from the government.
|
| Professor Loftus | Professor |
Mentioned by the Court in the context of scheduling and time allocation for the proceedings.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A court proceeding to discuss narrowing the scope of an affidavit and to plan the logistics and timing for the remainder of the hearing, involving testimony or participation from Professor Loftus and Mr. Hamilton.
Courtroom (unspecified)
Relationships (4)
Mr. Rohrbach is addressing the Court as legal counsel in a formal proceeding.
Ms. Sternheim is addressing the Court as legal counsel, responding to questions and discussing logistics.
Ms. Pomerantz, representing the government, addresses the Court.
Mr. Rohrbach speaks of the 'defense response' while Ms. Pomerantz speaks for the 'government', indicating they are on opposing sides of the legal case.
Key Quotes (3)
"That's the government's understanding of the defense response, yes, is that it's narrowed to a few paragraphs of the affidavit."Source
— MR. ROHRBACH
(Confirming to the court that the scope of the issue has been narrowed.)
DOJ-OGR-00016622.jpg
Quote #1
"If we were to get there, we would have to do all the logistics about the Webex and I also would need to see if Mr. Hamilton is up to it, physically."Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Explaining the logistical challenges of proceeding with a certain part of the hearing on the same day.)
DOJ-OGR-00016622.jpg
Quote #2
"About how much longer on Professor Loftus?"Source
— THE COURT
(Inquiring about the time needed for Professor Loftus, likely a witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00016622.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,354 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 139 of 246 2434
LCGCmax4 Loftus - direct
LCGCmax4 Loftus - direct
1 was that there had been some narrowing there, as well; right?
2 MR. ROHRBACH: That's the government's understanding
3 of the defense response, yes, is that it's narrowed to a few
4 paragraphs of the affidavit.
5 THE COURT: A few paragraphs of the affidavit. Okay.
6 So I will focus my attention on those few paragraphs of the
7 affidavit and try to come back with resolution after lunch if I
8 can. If not, end of the day -- is it fair to assume we're not
9 going to get to that today?
10 MS. STERNHEIM: That is correct, Judge. If we were to
11 get there, we would have to do all the logistics about the
12 Webex and I also would need to see if Mr. Hamilton is up to it,
13 physically.
14 THE COURT: Well, you should make that call --
15 MS. STERNHEIM: I am doing that --
16 THE COURT: Because it will either be today or
17 tomorrow; right?
18 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes.
19 THE COURT: Okay. And then what else do I need to
20 consider? Anything else?
21 MS. POMERANTZ: Not from the government.
22 THE COURT: About how much longer on Professor Loftus?
23 MS. STERNHEIM: With the lunch break, much shorter. I
24 don't expect to be very long and I would like to trim it so
25 that we can move on.
2 MR. ROHRBACH: That's the government's understanding
3 of the defense response, yes, is that it's narrowed to a few
4 paragraphs of the affidavit.
5 THE COURT: A few paragraphs of the affidavit. Okay.
6 So I will focus my attention on those few paragraphs of the
7 affidavit and try to come back with resolution after lunch if I
8 can. If not, end of the day -- is it fair to assume we're not
9 going to get to that today?
10 MS. STERNHEIM: That is correct, Judge. If we were to
11 get there, we would have to do all the logistics about the
12 Webex and I also would need to see if Mr. Hamilton is up to it,
13 physically.
14 THE COURT: Well, you should make that call --
15 MS. STERNHEIM: I am doing that --
16 THE COURT: Because it will either be today or
17 tomorrow; right?
18 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes.
19 THE COURT: Okay. And then what else do I need to
20 consider? Anything else?
21 MS. POMERANTZ: Not from the government.
22 THE COURT: About how much longer on Professor Loftus?
23 MS. STERNHEIM: With the lunch break, much shorter. I
24 don't expect to be very long and I would like to trim it so
25 that we can move on.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016622
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document