This document is a table of contents for an argument or legal brief, outlining sections like 'Table of Cited Authorities,' 'Interest of Amici,' 'Introduction and Summary of Argument,' and a detailed 'Argument' section. The argument points discuss the reliability of government promises, the Department of Justice's ability to draft plea agreements, and the practice of USAOs regarding plea agreement scope in contrast to a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Department of Justice |
mentioned in relation to drafting plea agreements and future prosecutions
|
|
| USAOs |
mentioned in relation to limiting the scope of plea agreements
|
"Defendants should be able to rely on the government's promises and courts should not hesitate to enforce them."Source
"The Department of Justice knows how to draft plea agreements to bind only part of the Department in future prosecutions."Source
"The consistent practice of USAOs to limit the scope of plea agreements stands in stark contrast to the scope of the NPA here."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (584 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document