You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

DOJ-OGR-00000196.tif

15.4 KB

Extraction Summary

0
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Table of contents
File Size: 15.4 KB
Summary

This document is a table of contents for an argument or legal brief, outlining sections like 'Table of Cited Authorities,' 'Interest of Amici,' 'Introduction and Summary of Argument,' and a detailed 'Argument' section. The argument points discuss the reliability of government promises, the Department of Justice's ability to draft plea agreements, and the practice of USAOs regarding plea agreement scope in contrast to a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA).

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Department of Justice
mentioned in relation to drafting plea agreements and future prosecutions
USAOs
mentioned in relation to limiting the scope of plea agreements

Key Quotes (3)

"Defendants should be able to rely on the government's promises and courts should not hesitate to enforce them."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000196.tif
Quote #1
"The Department of Justice knows how to draft plea agreements to bind only part of the Department in future prosecutions."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000196.tif
Quote #2
"The consistent practice of USAOs to limit the scope of plea agreements stands in stark contrast to the scope of the NPA here."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000196.tif
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (584 characters)

2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS..
Page
....i
TABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES..
ii
INTEREST OF AMICI..
.1
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF
ARGUMENT.
.2
ARGUMENT.
.3
1. Defendants should be able to rely on the
government's promises and courts should
not hesitate to enforce them.
.......3
2. The Department of Justice knows how to
draft plea agreements to bind only part of
the Department in future prosecutions........8
3. The consistent practice of USAOs to limit
the scope of plea agreements stands in stark
contrast to the scope of the NPA here........12
CONCLUSION
.13
DOJ-OGR-00000196

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document