DOJ-OGR-00004780.jpg
592 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
592 KB
Summary
This is a court order issued on June 25, 2021, by Judge Alison J. Nathan in the criminal case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The order denies Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence and further orders the unsealing of documents from a related civil case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, including a memorandum and transcripts from hearings in March and April 2019. The parties are given a short timeframe to confer and propose redactions to these documents before they are made public.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Named as the defendant in the case United States of America v. Ghislaine Maxwell. Her motions to suppress evidence we...
|
| ALISON J. NATHAN | District Judge |
The judge who issued the order denying Maxwell's motions.
|
| Giuffre | Party in a lawsuit |
Mentioned as a party in a related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, from which documents are being unsealed.
|
| Lugosch | Party in a lawsuit |
Mentioned as a party in a cited legal case, Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, used as a reference for redaction sta...
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK | Government agency |
The court that issued this order.
|
| United States of America | Government agency |
The plaintiff in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| The Government | Government agency |
Refers to the United States of America, the plaintiff.
|
| Second Circuit | Government agency |
A U.S. Court of Appeals whose opinion in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga is cited as a standard for redactions.
|
| Pyramid Co. of Onondaga | Company |
A party in a cited legal case, Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga.
|
Timeline (4 events)
2019-03-26
An ex parte hearing was held on the Government's application to modify a protective order. The transcript of this hearing was ordered to be unsealed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2019-04-09
A memorandum decision and order on the Government's application to modify a protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell was issued. The court ordered this document to be unsealed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2019-04-09
An ex parte hearing was held on the Government's application to modify a protective order. The transcript of this hearing was ordered to be unsealed.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
2021-06-25
Ghislaine Maxwell's motions to suppress evidence (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) were denied by the Court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The jurisdiction of the United States District Court issuing the order.
|
Relationships (2)
The document identifies the United States of America as the plaintiff and Ghislaine Maxwell as the defendant in case 20-cr-330.
The document references a separate case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, indicating they were opposing parties in a lawsuit.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,560 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 303 Filed 06/25/21 Page 1 of 2
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 6/25/2021
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 6/25/2021
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United States of America,
-v-
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
20-cr-330 (AJN)
ORDER
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
Maxwell’s motions to suppress evidence (Dkt. Nos. 133, 139) are DENIED. The Court sets out its reasoning in an opinion concurrently filed under temporary seal to allow Maxwell and the Government the opportunity to propose redactions. The parties may file under seal any proposed redactions to the opinion within three days.
The Court further ORDERS that the April 9, 2019 memorandum decision and order on the Government’s application to modify the protective order in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433, as well as the transcripts of the March 26, 2019 and April 9, 2019 ex parte hearings on that application shall be unsealed. These documents were previously filed under seal as Exhibits D, E, F, and G to the memorandum of law in support of Maxwell’s first motion to suppress (Dkt. No. 134). Within one week, the parties shall confer and file under seal any proposed redactions to the memorandum decision, order, and transcripts.
Any proposed redactions shall be narrowly tailored and shall be supported with reference to the Second Circuit’s opinion in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). The parties’ proposed redactions should not include any information that has already been made public.
DOJ-OGR-00004780
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document