DOJ-OGR-00009708.jpg
396 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
396 KB
Summary
This is page 16 of a legal document filed on March 11, 2022, related to case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. The document discusses the final composition of the jury, noting that 694 potential jurors answered a questionnaire. A footnote explains that defense counsel was unable to find the Twitter account of 'Juror No. 50' during the voir dire process.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Potential Juror |
Mentioned in a footnote as the subject of an unsuccessful search for their Twitter account by defense counsel during ...
|
| defense counsel | Legal Representative |
Mentioned in a footnote as having attempted to locate Juror No. 50's Twitter account.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Company |
The social media platform on which Juror No. 50 had an account that defense counsel tried to locate.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Six-hundred and ninety-four potential jurors answered a 50-question questionnaire as part of the jury selection process.
694 potential jurors
During voir dire, defense counsel attempted to locate the Twitter account of Juror No. 50.
Relationships (1)
Defense counsel was investigating potential Juror No. 50 by attempting to locate their Twitter account during the voir dire process.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (574 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 16 of 66
[REDACTED TEXT]
D. The final composition of the jury
Six-hundred and ninety-four potential jurors answered the 50-question
questionnaire.
questionnaire.
[REDACTED TEXT]
¹ Despite attempts, defense counsel was unable to locate Juror No. 50’s Twitter account at the time of voir dire because his Twitter handle (@ScottyDavidNYC) did not include his last name and may have included an inaccurate middle name.
² The parties submitted this joint list before reviewing the second round of questionnaires.
² The parties submitted this joint list before reviewing the second round of questionnaires.
9
DOJ-OGR-00009708
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document