This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the judge and two counsels, Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger, clarifying that only specific parts ('subletters') of an evidence item ('52') are being moved into the record. After a brief recess, the judge confirms with counsel that they are ready to proceed and instructs that the jury be brought in.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, making rulings and directing the proceedings.
|
| MS. MOE | Counsel |
Speaker in the court transcript, responding to the judge's questions.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Counsel |
Speaker in the court transcript, responding to the judge's questions.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned by the court as the party that was not moving evidence '52 in its entirety'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'
|
"I've looked at the transcript, and the government expressly said it wasn't moving 52 in its entirety."Source
"We have our jury. Any reason not to bring them in, counsel?"Source
"Please bring in the jury."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (969 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document