DOJ-OGR-00013601.jpg

439 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 439 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details a procedural discussion between the judge and two counsels, Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger, clarifying that only specific parts ('subletters') of an evidence item ('52') are being moved into the record. After a brief recess, the judge confirms with counsel that they are ready to proceed and instructs that the jury be brought in.

People (3)

Name Role Context
THE COURT Judge
Speaker in the court transcript, making rulings and directing the proceedings.
MS. MOE Counsel
Speaker in the court transcript, responding to the judge's questions.
MS. MENNINGER Counsel
Speaker in the court transcript, responding to the judge's questions.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
government government agency
Mentioned by the court as the party that was not moving evidence '52 in its entirety'.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
A discussion in open court regarding the specifics of evidence being entered into the record, followed by a recess and the decision to bring the jury into the courtroom.
Courtroom
A recess occurred during the court proceedings.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.'

Relationships (2)

THE COURT professional MS. MOE
Formal interaction in a courtroom setting, where Ms. Moe addresses the court as 'your Honor'.
THE COURT professional MS. MENNINGER
Formal interaction in a courtroom setting, where Ms. Menninger addresses the court as 'your Honor'.

Key Quotes (3)

"I've looked at the transcript, and the government expressly said it wasn't moving 52 in its entirety."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge clarifying the scope of evidence being admitted.)
DOJ-OGR-00013601.jpg
Quote #1
"We have our jury. Any reason not to bring them in, counsel?"
Source
— THE COURT (The judge asking counsel if they are ready to proceed with the jury after a recess.)
DOJ-OGR-00013601.jpg
Quote #2
"Please bring in the jury."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge's instruction to court staff to begin the next phase of the trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00013601.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (969 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 10 of 267 2038
LCACmaxl
1 (In open court)
2 THE COURT: I've looked at the transcript, and the
3 government expressly said it wasn't moving 52 in its entirety.
4 So that's what's in issue and that's what I reserved on. So
5 it's the subletters. Then 52, what's been marked for
6 identification as 52 should be part of the record for purposes
7 of the 901 issue. Okay?
8 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you.
9 THE COURT: But what's been moved are the sub-sheet
10 copies.
11 If nothing else, I'll step down until we have our
12 jury.
13 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
14 THE COURT: Thank you.
15 (Recess)
16 THE COURT: We have our jury. Any reason not to bring
17 them in, counsel?
18 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you.
19 MS. MENNINGER: No, your Honor. Thank you.
20 THE COURT: Please bring in the jury.
21 (Continued on next page)
22
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013601

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document