DOJ-OGR-00016218.jpg
595 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
595 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a procedural discussion between the judge (THE COURT), Ms. Moe, and Mr. Pagliuca. The main topic is the clarification of how Government Exhibit 52 and its subparts are to be offered into evidence, ensuring all parties agree on the process involving a stipulation for accuracy.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the court proceedings, addresses counsel and clarifies procedural points.
|
| MS. MOE | Counsel |
Attorney discussing a housekeeping matter regarding the submission of Government Exhibit 52.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Counsel |
Attorney seeking clarification on the process of offering Government Exhibit 52 into evidence.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A procedural discussion took place regarding the admission of Government Exhibit 52 into evidence.
Courtroom
Relationships (3)
Ms. Moe addresses the court as 'your Honor' while discussing a legal matter.
Mr. Pagliuca participates in the court proceeding, interacting with the judge on a procedural point.
Both are identified as counsel and are discussing the procedure for entering an exhibit into evidence in a court case.
Key Quotes (3)
"Just a housekeeping matter with respect to Government Exhibit 52."Source
— MS. MOE
(Introducing the topic of discussion at the beginning of the court day.)
DOJ-OGR-00016218.jpg
Quote #1
"I'm not sure if we're saying the same thing. I understood that 52 was being offered foundationally, which is the entire document, and that then there are the excerpts that were being offered into evidence for the jury."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Expressing his understanding of the procedure for offering the exhibit and seeking clarification.)
DOJ-OGR-00016218.jpg
Quote #2
"Ms. Moe, it's your exhibit."Source
— THE COURT
(Prompting Ms. Moe to clarify her proposed handling of the exhibit she is offering.)
DOJ-OGR-00016218.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,490 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 267 2029
LCACmax1
LCACmax1
1 THE COURT: Good morning, everyone. Good to see
2 everyone. Matters to take up, counsel?
3 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you. Just a
4 housekeeping matter with respect to Government Exhibit 52. We
5 just wanted to clarify, before we offered the excerpts, that we
6 would be offering Government Exhibit 52 and its subparts
7 pursuant to a stipulation that they are true and accurate
8 photocopies. I just wanted to make sure we clarified that
9 before we offered it at the beginning of the court day.
10 MR. PAGLIUCA: I'm not sure if we're saying the same
11 thing. I understood that 52 was being offered foundationally,
12 which is the entire document, and that then there are the
13 excerpts that were being offered into evidence for the jury.
14 That was my understanding of the process that we were doing.
15 THE COURT: Ms. Moe, it's your exhibit.
16 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. I think the way in
17 which we're proposing handling this would be similar in the way
18 we handled the message pads, which is part of the
19 authentication, involves the message pads themselves. So those
20 exhibits were offered and also the subparts as marked
21 exhibit --
22 THE COURT: I think you are then saying the same
23 thing.
24 MR. PAGLIUCA: Okay. So you'll move 52 in its
25 entirety. There is a stipulation as to the accuracy of the
2 everyone. Matters to take up, counsel?
3 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you. Just a
4 housekeeping matter with respect to Government Exhibit 52. We
5 just wanted to clarify, before we offered the excerpts, that we
6 would be offering Government Exhibit 52 and its subparts
7 pursuant to a stipulation that they are true and accurate
8 photocopies. I just wanted to make sure we clarified that
9 before we offered it at the beginning of the court day.
10 MR. PAGLIUCA: I'm not sure if we're saying the same
11 thing. I understood that 52 was being offered foundationally,
12 which is the entire document, and that then there are the
13 excerpts that were being offered into evidence for the jury.
14 That was my understanding of the process that we were doing.
15 THE COURT: Ms. Moe, it's your exhibit.
16 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. I think the way in
17 which we're proposing handling this would be similar in the way
18 we handled the message pads, which is part of the
19 authentication, involves the message pads themselves. So those
20 exhibits were offered and also the subparts as marked
21 exhibit --
22 THE COURT: I think you are then saying the same
23 thing.
24 MR. PAGLIUCA: Okay. So you'll move 52 in its
25 entirety. There is a stipulation as to the accuracy of the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016218
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document