DOJ-OGR-00009710.jpg
497 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
497 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on March 11, 2022, as part of case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, alleges juror misconduct. It claims that Juror No. 50 and a second deliberating juror were untruthful on their jury questionnaires by denying they had been victims of sexual abuse, assault, or harassment. The document contrasts this with the other alternate and deliberating jurors, none of whom disclosed such a history.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
Mentioned as not telling the truth on his questionnaire about being a victim of a crime or sexual abuse.
|
| a second deliberating juror | Juror |
Mentioned as also being untruthful on their questionnaire about being a victim of sexual abuse.
|
| an original juror | Juror |
Mentioned in a footnote as being excused due to a family commitment, leading to an alternate becoming a deliberating ...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | government agency |
Mentioned as the entity to which Juror No. 50 was not truthful and which seated the jurors.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Juror No. 50 and a second deliberating juror were untruthful on their jury selection questionnaires, denying they were victims of sexual abuse, assault, or harassment.
The Court
Relationships (1)
The document states that "Juror No. 50’s admissions that he wasn’t truthful with the Court."
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,305 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 642 Filed 03/11/22 Page 18 of 66
● Of the 5 jurors seated as alternates, none disclosed on their questionnaires
that they were victims of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual
harassment.⁴
● Of the 12 deliberating jurors, none disclosed on their questionnaires that
they were victims of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.
As we now know, however, Juror No. 50 was not telling the truth when he denied being a
victim of a crime or being a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.
And as explained below, it appears a second deliberating juror was also untruthful when
they denied being a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.
II. Juror No. 50’s admissions that he wasn’t truthful with the Court
⁴ The court originally seated 6 alternates, but one alternate became a deliberating
juror when an original juror was excused due to a family commitment. None of the 18
individuals selected for service as a deliberating or alternate juror answered “yes” when
asked if they were a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.
juror when an original juror was excused due to a family commitment. None of the 18
individuals selected for service as a deliberating or alternate juror answered “yes” when
asked if they were a victim of sexual abuse, sexual assault, or sexual harassment.
11
DOJ-OGR-00009710
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document