DOJ-OGR-00010071.jpg
394 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
394 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript where a witness named Edelstein is being questioned by an attorney, Mr. Okula. The questioning focuses on Edelstein's knowledge of a Westlaw report and a series of email exchanges on May 12th involving his partner, Randy Kim, and a Theresa Trzaskoma. These emails allegedly led Trzaskoma to believe that 'Juror No. 1' was a suspended attorney, and the questioning also references a 'Jesus e-mail' and a July 15 court conference.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edelstein | Witness |
The person being questioned in the transcript.
|
| MR. SCHECTMAN | Attorney |
An attorney who objects to a question during the proceeding.
|
| MR. OKULA | Attorney |
An attorney who is questioning the witness, Edelstein.
|
| Susan Brune |
Mentioned in a question to the witness about whether they discussed the Westlaw report with her.
|
|
| Theresa Trzaskoma |
A person involved in email exchanges on May 12th and a court conference on July 15th.
|
|
| Randy Kim | Partner |
The witness's partner in San Francisco, with whom the witness discussed the Westlaw report and who had email exchange...
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Identified in an email exchange as a 'suspended attorney'.
|
| Jesus |
Mentioned in the context of a specific email, referred to as the 'Jesus e-mail'.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Westlaw | Company |
Mentioned in the context of a 'Westlaw report' that the witness reviewed.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-02-22
Testimony of witness Edelstein, being questioned by Mr. Okula in the presence of Mr. Schectman and the Court.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of the witness's partner, Randy Kim.
|
Key Quotes (2)
"I discussed it with my partner, Randy Kim in San Francisco."Source
— Edelstein
(Responding to a question about whom he discussed the Westlaw report with.)
DOJ-OGR-00010071.jpg
Quote #1
"Did Mr. Kim tell you about the e-mail exchanges that he had had with Theresa Trzaskoma earlier on May 12th that led Ms. Trzaskoma to conclude that Juror No. 1 was the suspended attorney?"Source
— MR. OKULA
(Questioning the witness about his knowledge of specific email communications.)
DOJ-OGR-00010071.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,249 characters)
Case 2:20-cr-00033-BDB Doc 646-2 Filed 02/22/22 Page 331 of 330
A-5788
A-5788
331
C2GFDAU3
Edelstein
1 A. I'm not sure I understand --
2 MR. SCHECTMAN: May I be heard? I object to same name
3 for her father. No one knew her father's name, so I object to
4 that.
5 MR. OKULA: I'll rephrase it, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Very well.
7 Q. You reviewed the Westlaw report, correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Did you discuss it with Susan Brune?
10 A. No.
11 Q. Did you discuss it with Theresa Trzaskoma?
12 A. No.
13 Q. Whom did you discuss it with?
14 A. I discussed it with my partner, Randy Kim in San Francisco.
15 Q. Did Mr. Kim tell you about the e-mail exchanges that he had
16 had with Theresa Trzaskoma earlier on May 12th that led Ms.
17 Trzaskoma to conclude that Juror No. 1 was the suspended
18 attorney?
19 A. I discussed several of the e-mail exchanges, but he was
20 only on a number of them.
21 Q. Did you see the May 12 series of e-mail exchanges involving
22 Theresa Trzaskoma including the Jesus e-mail before Theresa
23 Trzaskoma took part in the July 15 court conference?
24 A. No.
25 Q. When did you see that e-mail?
C2GFDAU3
Edelstein
1 A. I'm not sure I understand --
2 MR. SCHECTMAN: May I be heard? I object to same name
3 for her father. No one knew her father's name, so I object to
4 that.
5 MR. OKULA: I'll rephrase it, your Honor.
6 THE COURT: Very well.
7 Q. You reviewed the Westlaw report, correct?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Did you discuss it with Susan Brune?
10 A. No.
11 Q. Did you discuss it with Theresa Trzaskoma?
12 A. No.
13 Q. Whom did you discuss it with?
14 A. I discussed it with my partner, Randy Kim in San Francisco.
15 Q. Did Mr. Kim tell you about the e-mail exchanges that he had
16 had with Theresa Trzaskoma earlier on May 12th that led Ms.
17 Trzaskoma to conclude that Juror No. 1 was the suspended
18 attorney?
19 A. I discussed several of the e-mail exchanges, but he was
20 only on a number of them.
21 Q. Did you see the May 12 series of e-mail exchanges involving
22 Theresa Trzaskoma including the Jesus e-mail before Theresa
23 Trzaskoma took part in the July 15 court conference?
24 A. No.
25 Q. When did you see that e-mail?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010071
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document