This document is a page from a court transcript of a summation given by Ms. Menninger on August 10, 2022. She discusses the fallibility of memory, arguing that the accusers' memories could have been influenced by external factors such as talking to lawyers, media, and each other, as well as by the psychological process of autosuggestion. Menninger explains that post-event information and the passage of time can contaminate or distort memories, especially when there is a financial motive like recovering money from lawsuits or a compensation fund.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger |
Mentioned in the header as the speaker giving the summation.
|
|
| the accusers | accuser |
A group of individuals who are the subject of the summation, mentioned as having talked to lawyers, media, and other ...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| victims' compensation fund | fund |
Mentioned as a means through which the accusers planned to recover money.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the document.
|
"Basically, when people suggest things to themselves, and then they start to remember things and they start to draw inferences, and then they start to feel as if those things are actual memories."Source
"And post-event information can impact a memory at any one of those stages."Source
"The older a memory gets, the more susceptible it is to post-event information."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,733 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document