EFTA00027856.pdf
97.3 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
97.3 KB
Summary
An email chain between US Attorney's Office (SDNY) staff from August 6 to August 9, 2019, discussing a draft legal response to preservation requests filed by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team. The prosecutors debate whether to send the response on Friday, August 9th, or wait until Monday, August 12th, noting that the delay wouldn't significantly impact the case. This correspondence occurred immediately prior to Epstein's death on August 10, 2019.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant/Subject |
Subject of the defense preservation requests being discussed.
|
| Redacted Senders/Recipients | Legal Counsel/Prosecutors |
Employees of USANYS (US Attorney's Office) discussing legal strategy.
|
| Assistant U.S. Attorney | Author |
Signatory of the initial email in the chain (name redacted).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (email domain/affiliation).
|
|
| Southern District of New York |
Jurisdiction mentioned in signature block.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2019-08-09
Legal team finalizing response to Epstein defense preservation requests.
New York
USANYS Staff
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Office location of the Assistant U.S. Attorney.
|
Relationships (1)
USANYS Staff
→
Adversarial Legal
→
Epstein Defense Counsel
Drafting response to defense preservation requests.
Key Quotes (3)
"realistically I don’t think the defense can make much more hay about having gotten a response on the 9th versus the 12th"Source
EFTA00027856.pdf
Quote #1
"If we don't get this out until Monday is that a problem?"Source
EFTA00027856.pdf
Quote #2
"The attached is based on our conversations with [Redacted], including his email with suggested language for the prefatory language, and responds to the two attached defense letters."Source
EFTA00027856.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,436 characters)
From: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Cc: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 17:27:13 +0000
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Cc: "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2019 17:27:13 +0000
Sure — let us know if we’re ultimately able to send today, otherwise we’ll check back on Monday, thanks.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2019 13:26
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2019 13:26
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Okay, thanks. [Redacted] is signed off but we may have to chat briefly with [Redacted] when he’s back on Monday.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 9, 2019, at 1:21 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
I’m totally available to update it this afternoon if there are edits today, but realistically I don’t think the defense can make much more hay about having gotten a response on the 9th versus the 12th
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2019 13:20
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2019 13:20
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
If we don’t get this out until Monday is that a problem?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 8, 2019, at 5:56 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
No problem, thanks, and the edits were all straightforward. Updated version attached, everything incorporated, and can go to [Redacted] — I’m out of commission the next couple hours but back after that.
thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2019 16:36
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2019 16:36
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sorry for the delay. Combined edits from both of us, attached. Can you take a look and clean up — we would then like to give [Redacted] at least the option of weighing in before we send to defense counsel.
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 11:44 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sent: Thursday, August 8, 2019 11:44 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Wanted to bump this from Tuesday, especially since I know you guys are out tomorrow — hopefully we can send it out today? Happy to incorporate any edits etc. Thanks.
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2019 15:01
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
Sent: Tuesday, August 06, 2019 15:01
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: draft response to Epstein defense preservation requests
[Redacted],
This has been in the works for a little while, due to various other things that have come up in the interim, but we didn’t want it to get lost given the discovery motion schedule. The attached is based on our conversations with [Redacted], including his email with suggested language for the prefatory language, and responds to the two attached defense letters. Happy to discuss anytime and to incorporate comments and suggestions.
thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Assistant U.S. Attorney
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
<2019-08-08, JE, letter to defense re preservation requests.docx>
EFTA00027856
EFTA00027857
EFTA00027856
EFTA00027857
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document