DOJ-OGR-00010225.jpg

510 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 510 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on March 11, 2022. It details the questioning of a potential juror regarding their answers on a juror questionnaire. The individual clarifies that their experience with sexual abuse was not what they considered when answering about being a victim of a crime, stating they no longer identify as a victim and can serve as a fair and impartial juror.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Unnamed Witness/Juror Witness / Potential Juror
The person answering questions, denoted by 'A'. They discuss their past experience with sexual abuse and affirm their...
Unnamed Questioner Questioner (likely attorney or judge)
The person asking questions, denoted by 'Q'. They are inquiring about the witness's answers on a questionnaire.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting firm that created the document.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-03-11
A potential juror is questioned about their answers on a questionnaire as part of the jury selection process for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
A potential juror filled out a questionnaire on November 4, leaving question 25A blank.

Relationships (1)

Unnamed Questioner Legal/Professional Unnamed Witness/Juror
The document is a transcript of a formal questioning session, likely voir dire, where a legal professional is assessing a potential juror's fitness to serve on a jury.

Key Quotes (2)

"I wasn't thinking of my sexual abuse as being a victim of a crime because I no longer associate being a victim. It's part of my healing process and it's how I dealt with the abuse."
Source
— Unnamed Witness/Juror (Explaining why they did not consider their past sexual abuse when answering a questionnaire about being a victim of a crime like robbery or mugging.)
DOJ-OGR-00010225.jpg
Quote #1
"It would have been no. I was definitely able to set aside everything and be fair and impartial."
Source
— Unnamed Witness/Juror (Providing the accurate answer to question 25A on the questionnaire, which asked if any experience would prevent them from being a fair and impartial juror.)
DOJ-OGR-00010225.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,170 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 10 of 50
M38TMAX1
A. Yes self.
Q. And when you say "yes self," what are you referring to?
A. I'm referring to the sexual abuse.
What I was thinking when I was completing that
questionnaire was like if I was robbed or mugged or some sort
of crime like that. I wasn't thinking of my sexual abuse as
being a victim of a crime because I no longer associate being a
victim. It's part of my healing process and it's how I dealt
with the abuse.
Q. Have you ever been robbed?
A. Never.
Q. Ever been mugged?
A. Never.
Q. Family or friends ever been robbed?
A. No.
Q. Or mugged?
A. I don't know anybody that has ever been robbed or mugged.
Q. Question 25A, asked: If yes, is there anything about the
experience that would prevent you from acting as a fair and
impartial juror in this case?
You left that blank when you filled it out on
November 4. What is an accurate answer to 25A?
A. It would have been no. I was definitely able to set aside
everything and be fair and impartial.
Q. Okay. In light of the answer that you gave to 48A, I am
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010225

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document