DOJ-OGR-00013254.jpg

498 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 498 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on voice messages left for the witness by a Mr. Scarola in 2019 and 2020 concerning contact with the government. The opposing counsel, Ms. Comey, repeatedly objects to this line of questioning on the basis of privilege, and the court sustains her objections, preventing the witness from answering.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Carolyn Witness
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined.
Mr. Scarola
Mentioned as the person who left multiple voice messages for the witness in 2019 and 2020 about contacting the govern...
MS. COMEY Attorney
An attorney who makes objections during the questioning.
MR. PAGLIUCA Attorney
An attorney conducting the cross-examination of the witness.
your Honor Judge
Addressed as 'your Honor' by the attorneys, presides over the court and rules on objections.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.

Timeline (3 events)

2019
Mr. Scarola left messages for Carolyn, to which she did not respond.
2020
Mr. Scarola left multiple voice messages for Carolyn regarding the government.
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Court

Relationships (2)

MR. PAGLIUCA professional MS. COMEY
They are opposing counsel in a court proceeding, with Mr. Pagliuca asking questions and Ms. Comey objecting to them.
Mr. Scarola unspecified Carolyn
Mr. Scarola repeatedly attempted to contact Carolyn via messages in 2019 and 2020, which she did not respond to.

Key Quotes (3)

"I don't understand the basis for the objection, your Honor."
Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA (Said in response to the court sustaining Ms. Comey's objection to his line of questioning.)
DOJ-OGR-00013254.jpg
Quote #1
"Privilege, your Honor."
Source
— MS. COMEY (Stated as the basis for her objection to Mr. Pagliuca's question.)
DOJ-OGR-00013254.jpg
Quote #2
"I sustained the objection. That's why I said go to the next question."
Source
— THE COURT (The judge's explanation for why the attorney should move on from the current line of questioning.)
DOJ-OGR-00013254.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,449 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 241 of 264
LC7Cmax8 Carolyn - cross
1 Q. And you didn't respond to those in 2019; correct?
2 A. Correct.
3 Q. Mr. Scarola also left you multiple --
4 THE COURT: Just a second. Go ahead.
5 A. I'm not sure -- the dates and everything have been run
6 together right now.
7 Q. Mr. Scarola also left multiple voice messages for you with
8 regard to the government, correct, in 2020?
9 MS. COMEY: Objection, your Honor.
10 THE COURT: Sustained.
11 MR. PAGLIUCA: If I can direct the witness to 3505 --
12 THE COURT: No, question. What's your question?
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: I understand.
14 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:
15 Q. The question is, you were aware that Mr. Scarola was
16 leaving messages for you about contacting the government?
17 A. I -- to Mr. Scarola --
18 THE COURT: Just a minute.
19 MS. COMEY: Objection.
20 THE COURT: I sustained the objection. That's why I
21 said go to the next question.
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: I don't understand the basis for the
23 objection, your Honor.
24 MS. COMEY: Privilege, your Honor.
25 THE COURT: Sustained. Sustained. Next question.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013254

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document