This document is a page from an article or report (marked House Oversight) detailing the political landscape surrounding Bitcoin regulation. It focuses on a June 13 conference at the U.S. Institute of Peace, sponsored by Thompson Reuters and the International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (ICMEC). The text highlights a heated exchange between Patrick Murck (Bitcoin Foundation) and Andrew Oosterbaan (DOJ) regarding the comparison of Bitcoin to child pornography.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Gavin Andressen | Lead Bitcoin developer |
Panelist at the June 13 conference.
|
| Patrick Murck | General Counsel |
Bitcoin Foundation general counsel; panelist who debated Oosterbaan.
|
| Andrew Oosterbaan | Prosecutor |
Justice Department prosecutor for child pornography cases; panelist.
|
| Ernie Allen | President |
President (implied of ICMEC based on context); commented on the conference being a launching point.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Institute of Peace |
Venue for the June 13 conference.
|
|
| Bitcoin Foundation |
Organization represented by Patrick Murck.
|
|
| Thompson Reuters |
Sponsor of the conference.
|
|
| International Centre for Missing and Exploited Children (ICMEC) |
Sponsor of the conference; framed the discussion around child pornography.
|
|
| Justice Department |
Employer of Andrew Oosterbaan.
|
|
| Obama administration |
Officials testified regarding Bitcoin regulations.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the June 13 conference.
|
|
|
Implied by 'Washingtonians', 'inside the beltway', and USIP location.
|
"Child pornography is like Bitcoin in some ways... It has intrinsic value to people who want it."Source
"Bitcoin is nothing like child pornography... If there was one instance of a child being abused because of Bitcoin, that's one too many."Source
"I want to craft a sane regulatory environment... Don't have secret meetings. Have public meetings."Source
"We always intended that conference to be a launching point"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,998 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document