DOJ-OGR-00001753.jpg
532 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
532 KB
Summary
This is page 2 of a legal filing from August 17, 2020, in case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan. The document concerns a dispute over materials designated as 'Confidential' by the government, arguing that under Second Circuit precedent, they are 'judicial documents' with a right to public access. It states that Ms. Maxwell has objected to the designation and seeks to provide the materials under seal to judicial officers to resolve pending issues.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | The Honorable |
The document is addressed to The Honorable Alison J. Nathan.
|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Mentioned as a party in the case who objected to the government's 'Confidential' designation and seeks to provide mat...
|
|
| Brown |
Mentioned as a party in the cited case 'Brown v. Maxwell'.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Second Circuit | court |
Cited for its definition of 'Confidential' and its characterization of certain materials as 'judicial documents'.
|
| The Court | court |
Referenced as the body that does not need to decide on the confidentiality of the material at this time.
|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as the entity that marked materials as 'Confidential' and whose designation was objected to by Ms. Maxwell.
|
| DOJ | government agency |
Implied by the footer identifier 'DOJ-OGR-00001753'.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Ms. Maxwell objected to the government’s Confidential designation under paragraph 9 of the Protective Order.
Ms. Maxwell requested that the government withdraw the 'Confidential' designation.
Relationships (1)
Ms. Maxwell objected to the government's 'Confidential' designation of materials in a legal proceeding.
Key Quotes (2)
"The Second Circuit has characterized these types of documents as “judicial documents” with a presumptive right of public access."Source
— Author of the document
(Used as a legal argument against the 'Confidential' designation of materials, citing the case Brown v. Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00001753.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court does not need to decide the issue of whether the Material is confidential at this time given that Ms. Maxwell seeks only to provide the Material to judicial officers under seal as information necessary to fairly decide pending issues in those cases."Source
— Author of the document
(Explaining the current procedural posture and why a ruling on confidentiality is not immediately necessary.)
DOJ-OGR-00001753.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,249 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 52 Filed 09/02/20 Page 2 of 8
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
August 17, 2020
Page 2
August 17, 2020
Page 2
3 The items to be referred to (and not filed) are confidential; accordingly, referring to them under seal in the Other Matters will not prejudice the government.
Relevant Facts and Procedural History
[REDACTED TEXT]
3 The Materials to be filed are attached, under seal, as exhibits [REDACTED]. Although marked by the government as “Confidential,” the Materials are not “Confidential” as that term has been defined by the Second Circuit. They consist of [REDACTED].
[REDACTED TEXT] The Second Circuit has characterized these types of documents as “judicial documents” with a presumptive right of public access. See Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 47 (2d Cir. 2019). Ms. Maxwell objected to the government’s Confidential designation under paragraph 9 of the Protective Order, and requested that the government withdraw the designation. The Court does not need to decide the issue of whether the Material is confidential at this time given that Ms. Maxwell seeks only to provide the Material to judicial officers under seal as information necessary to fairly decide pending issues in those cases.
[REDACTED TEXT]
DOJ-OGR-00001753
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document