DOJ-OGR-00021579.jpg
542 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
542 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from June 29, 2023, detailing a legal argument about whether an individual named Maxwell had supervisory authority over another person named Kellen. An attorney, Mr. Everdell, argues to the judge that pilot testimony and the fact that someone was present while Kellen scheduled massage appointments is insufficient evidence to prove a supervisory role. The discussion also touches upon sentencing enhancements for sex offenders.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell |
Mentioned as a potential employer or supervisor of an employee, and as having supervisory authority over Kellen.
|
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as a potential employer of an employee, alongside Maxwell.
|
|
| Kellen |
An individual who allegedly reported to Maxwell and was making calls and scheduling massage appointments.
|
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
A speaker in the court transcript, addressing the judge ('Your Honor') and arguing against the interpretation of supe...
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
A speaker in the court transcript, addressing the judge.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
The judge being addressed by MR. EVERDELL and MS. MOE. Also speaks as 'THE COURT'.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2023-06-29
A legal argument took place regarding the interpretation of pilot testimony about Maxwell's supervisory authority over Kellen, and sentencing enhancements.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where Kellen was making calls and scheduling appointments.
|
Relationships (3)
The document discusses whether Maxwell had supervisory authority over Kellen, based on pilot testimony that Kellen reported to Maxwell.
Mentioned together as potential employers of an unnamed employee, suggesting a shared enterprise or conspiracy.
Mr. Everdell is an attorney presenting an argument to the judge (Your Honor) in a formal court setting.
Key Quotes (3)
"Being present does not mean that you're a supervisor. That's way too far a stretch."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Arguing to the court that testimony of someone being present while Kellen made calls does not establish supervisory authority.)
DOJ-OGR-00021579.jpg
Quote #1
"So the fact that there was testimony she was present still in the house while Kellen was making the calls and scheduling the massage appointments means nothing in terms of supervisory authority."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Concluding his argument to the judge about the lack of evidence for supervisory authority.)
DOJ-OGR-00021579.jpg
Quote #2
"I believe I have what I need, but as I"Source
— THE COURT
(Responding to Mr. Everdell's question about discussing a five-point enhancement.)
DOJ-OGR-00021579.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,680 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 78, 06/29/2023, 3536039, Page149 of 217
SA-403
34
M6SQmax1
1 With respect to the testimony of the pilots who
2 testified, whether they -- whether an employee was paid by
3 Maxwell or Epstein or technically reported to one, according to
4 their job descriptions, is not the question here. The fact
5 that pilots based on their observation thought at one point
6 that Kellen reported to Maxwell proves the point that she had
7 supervisory authority over Kellen and exercised it, whether in
8 the chain of command or on their formal employment paperwork,
9 she was just an employee for one or the other, it makes no
10 difference. There was an overlap here. They had different
11 roles in the conspiracy, and the defendant had a supervisory
12 roll over Kellen.
13 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, just to that point. Being
14 present does not mean that you're a supervisor. That's way too
15 far a stretch. So the fact that there was testimony she was
16 present still in the house while Kellen was making the calls
17 and scheduling the massage appointments means nothing in terms
18 of supervisory authority.
19 THE COURT: Thank you. Other enhancements before the
20 government's objection is to be addressed.
21 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you.
22 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I assume you don't want to
23 hear or have any questions about the five-point enhancement for
24 repeated and dangerous sex offenders.
25 THE COURT: I believe I have what I need, but as I
SA-403
34
M6SQmax1
1 With respect to the testimony of the pilots who
2 testified, whether they -- whether an employee was paid by
3 Maxwell or Epstein or technically reported to one, according to
4 their job descriptions, is not the question here. The fact
5 that pilots based on their observation thought at one point
6 that Kellen reported to Maxwell proves the point that she had
7 supervisory authority over Kellen and exercised it, whether in
8 the chain of command or on their formal employment paperwork,
9 she was just an employee for one or the other, it makes no
10 difference. There was an overlap here. They had different
11 roles in the conspiracy, and the defendant had a supervisory
12 roll over Kellen.
13 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, just to that point. Being
14 present does not mean that you're a supervisor. That's way too
15 far a stretch. So the fact that there was testimony she was
16 present still in the house while Kellen was making the calls
17 and scheduling the massage appointments means nothing in terms
18 of supervisory authority.
19 THE COURT: Thank you. Other enhancements before the
20 government's objection is to be addressed.
21 MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you.
22 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I assume you don't want to
23 hear or have any questions about the five-point enhancement for
24 repeated and dangerous sex offenders.
25 THE COURT: I believe I have what I need, but as I
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00021579
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document