DOJ-OGR-00013280.jpg
577 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
577 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures a dialogue between the judge, government counsel (Mr. Rohrbach), and defense counsel (Ms. Menninger). The discussion focuses on the defense's intentions regarding witnesses Jane and Brian, specifically whether Brian will be released from his subpoena and if Jane will be recalled. Ms. Menninger states Brian is already under subpoena, prompting the judge to recall her previous statement that she would not subpoena him.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, questioning counsel.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Counsel for the government |
Addressing the court on behalf of the government, asking about the defense's plans for witnesses Jane and Brian.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Defense Counsel |
Responding to the court and government counsel, discussing the status of witnesses Jane and Brian.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Subject of discussion regarding being recalled to testify and a conversation she had with her brother.
|
| Brian | Witness |
Subject of discussion regarding his subpoena status and a motion to exclude him.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the government | Government agency |
A party in the legal case, represented by Mr. Rohrbach.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings, listed in the footer.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-09
A discussion took place at the end of the court day regarding the defense's plans for witnesses Jane and Brian.
Courtroom
2022-08-10
A discussion in court between the judge and counsel for the government and defense regarding the status of witnesses Jane and Brian, specifically concerning subpoenas and potential testimony.
Courtroom
Relationships (2)
Ms. Menninger refers to "conversations she [Jane] had with her brother," implying Brian is Jane's brother.
They are opposing counsel in a court case, representing the government and the defense, respectively.
Key Quotes (2)
"We already have Brian under subpoena, your Honor."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Stated to the court to clarify that Brian is currently under subpoena by the defense.)
DOJ-OGR-00013280.jpg
Quote #1
"I did ask yesterday if you had prevailed on your motion not to exclude Brian, would you subpoena him and you said no."Source
— THE COURT
(Reminding defense counsel, Ms. Menninger, of her previous statement regarding her intention to subpoena Brian under a specific circumstance.)
DOJ-OGR-00013280.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,552 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 262 1707
LC8Cmax1
LC8Cmax1
1 THE COURT: Good morning, everyone. Matters to take
2 up, counsel?
3 MR. ROHRBACH: A couple matters from the government,
4 your Honor.
5 THE COURT: Yes.
6 MR. ROHRBACH: First, we just wanted to confirm, as
7 per our discussion at the end of the day yesterday, that
8 whether or not the defense is planning to recall Jane and
9 whether they are releasing Brian from subpoena.
10 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I had understood that
11 there was going to be a conversation with Jane about the
12 conversations she had with her brother, and that would be
13 disclosed to us. I didn't receive that last night. I think we
14 need to know whether there is not truth telling going on in the
15 recounting of this event.
16 THE COURT: And that's with respect to recalling Jane,
17 not with respect to subpoenaing Brian; correct?
18 MS. MENNINGER: It could be with respect to either
19 one. We already have Brian under subpoena, your Honor. With
20 respect to the calling of Jane, I would like to know that
21 before we make a decision.
22 THE COURT: I did ask yesterday if you had prevailed
23 on your motion not to exclude Brian, would you subpoena him and
24 you said no. I realize you didn't prevail nor did you -- not
25 prevail, the government withdrew him, but is your position now
2 up, counsel?
3 MR. ROHRBACH: A couple matters from the government,
4 your Honor.
5 THE COURT: Yes.
6 MR. ROHRBACH: First, we just wanted to confirm, as
7 per our discussion at the end of the day yesterday, that
8 whether or not the defense is planning to recall Jane and
9 whether they are releasing Brian from subpoena.
10 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I had understood that
11 there was going to be a conversation with Jane about the
12 conversations she had with her brother, and that would be
13 disclosed to us. I didn't receive that last night. I think we
14 need to know whether there is not truth telling going on in the
15 recounting of this event.
16 THE COURT: And that's with respect to recalling Jane,
17 not with respect to subpoenaing Brian; correct?
18 MS. MENNINGER: It could be with respect to either
19 one. We already have Brian under subpoena, your Honor. With
20 respect to the calling of Jane, I would like to know that
21 before we make a decision.
22 THE COURT: I did ask yesterday if you had prevailed
23 on your motion not to exclude Brian, would you subpoena him and
24 you said no. I realize you didn't prevail nor did you -- not
25 prevail, the government withdrew him, but is your position now
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013280
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document