HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011765.jpg

2.2 MB

Extraction Summary

8
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book manuscript / memoir page (house oversight committee exhibit)
File Size: 2.2 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page from a memoir or book by Ehud Barak (indicated by the header), included in House Oversight Committee records. The text details the immediate aftermath of the 1996 Israeli election where Shimon Peres lost to Benjamin 'Bibi' Netanyahu. It describes a breakfast meeting where senior Labor ministers Avraham Shochat and Fuad Ben-Eliezer urged the narrator (Barak) to replace Peres as the party leader to challenge Netanyahu.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Ehud Barak Narrator (Implied)
Author of the text (indicated by header '/ BARAK /'), contemplating running for Labor party leadership.
Shimon Peres Former Prime Minister/Labor Party Leader
Referred to as 'Shimon'; just lost the election to Netanyahu.
Benjamin Netanyahu Prime Minister Elect
Referred to as 'Bibi'; described as smart, organizationally astute, and a former sayeret officer.
Fuad Ben-Eliezer Senior Labor Minister
Attended breakfast meeting; urged narrator to run for leadership.
Avraham Shochat Finance Minister
Served under Rabin and Peres; urged narrator to run for leadership.
Yitzhak Rabin Former Prime Minister (Deceased)
Referred to as 'Yitzhak' and 'Rabin'; mentioned in context of sacrifice and previous administration.
Hafez al-Assad President of Syria
Referred to as 'Assad'; mentioned regarding peace agreement outlines.
Haim Ramon Labor Politician
Referred to as 'Ramon'; mentioned regarding campaign differences.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Labor Party
Israeli political party discussing leadership changes.
Knesset
Israeli Parliament; narrator mentions being an elected member.
Sayeret
Military unit; referencing Netanyahu's service.
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document (via Bates stamp).

Timeline (2 events)

1996
Israeli General Election defeat for the Labor Party.
Israel
Morning after 1996 Election
Breakfast meeting regarding party leadership.
Israel

Locations (2)

Location Context
Implied country of political events.
Referenced in context of peace talks.

Relationships (3)

Ehud Barak Political Rivals Benjamin Netanyahu
Narrator expresses doubt about Bibi's ability to lead the peace process.
Ehud Barak Party Colleagues / Leadership Rivals Shimon Peres
Discussion of replacing Peres as party leader.
Avraham Shochat Former Subordinate / Political Dissenter Shimon Peres
Shochat served under Peres but declared 'Shimon is done'.

Key Quotes (4)

"Shimon is done"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011765.jpg
Quote #1
"You will have to go for the leadership."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011765.jpg
Quote #2
"I frankly wasn’t confident that Bibi was the man to lead it forward."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011765.jpg
Quote #3
"Yes, he was smart. He was organizationally astute. He’d been a good sayeret officer. Yet as I’d said it my TV spot, being Prime Minister required much more than that."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011765.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,432 characters)

/ BARAK / 8
Within days of the election, however, there was a new source of potential friction between us: Shimon’s future, and possibly mine, in leading our opposition to Bibi and bringing a Labor government back to power.
* * *
The question of Peres’s leadership was unavoidable. Labor’s constitution mandated a vote for party chairman within 14 months of an election defeat. But the widespread assumption was that Shimon would run again. A little before midnight on election day, with the returns beginning to show we might lose, I was invited to a morning-after breakfast by two senior Labor ministers: Fuad Ben-Eliezer, the man who had delivered the table-thumping warning that the hatred on the far-right would lead to a murder, and Avraham Shochat, Finance Minister under both Rabin and Peres. Both had been in the Knesset since the 1980s. Both were part of two of Peres’s earlier, failed, election campaigns. Both now said that they weren’t prepared to see him lead us into electoral battle the next time around. “Everyone in the party understands the meaning of this defeat. Shimon is done,” Shochat said, as Fuad nodded his agreement. “You will have to go for the leadership.”
Though their endorsement was a surprise, it would be disingenuous to pretend I hadn’t been thinking, at some stage in the future, of running for the party leadership. But my election-campaign differences with Ramon and Peres were not just for the sake of intellectual argument. I badly wanted us to win: both for Peres’s sake and the country’s, and to redeem and continue all that Yitzhak had sacrificed. Despite my misgivings about some aspects of the Oslo process, I did believe there was a possibility of achieving peace with the Palestinians. I knew, from my involvement in the talks with the Syrians, that the outline of a possible peace agreement with Assad was already in place. I frankly wasn’t confident that Bibi was the man to lead it forward. Yes, he was smart. He was organizationally astute. He’d been a good sayeret officer. Yet as I’d said it my TV spot, being Prime Minister required much more than that. I was now an elected Knesset member. But I had gone into politics in the hope of making a difference to how Israel confronted its defining challenges of war and peace. The prospect of spending the next few as a mere opposition foot soldier, making speeches and sitting in committee sessions,
294
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011765

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document