EFTA00029808.pdf
56.2 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
56.2 KB
Summary
This document is an internal email chain within the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS) dated June 29, 2020, discussing legal procedures related to the Epstein case. The prosecutors discuss the need for a new court order to disclose additional trust agreements to the Civil division, citing privacy concerns and the potential need to notify the individuals who provided the agreements. The chain references a previous 6(e) order from February and includes an attachment of a signed disclosure order.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| John McEnany | USANYS |
Sender of an email regarding the need for a new court order and privacy concerns.
|
| L. Fogelman | USANYS / DOJ |
Cc recipient on an email (email address LFogelman@usa.doj.gov).
|
| Redacted Co-Chief | Co-Chief, Public Corruption Unit |
Sender of the original email from January 2020.
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (1)
Included on the same email chain within USANYS/DOJ.
Key Quotes (3)
"Do you have a copy of the second 6(e) order from February that allowed Civil to review the additional trust agreements beyond those referenced in the order attached to [Redacted] email?"Source
EFTA00029808.pdf
Quote #1
"We need to apply for a new order with an application that would discuss why we need to disclose; privacy concerns; potential protective orders; should we give notice to the people we got the trust agreements from (and if not why not), etc."Source
EFTA00029808.pdf
Quote #2
"This is the original order, which does seem to suggest we need 'further order of the court' to further disclose."Source
EFTA00029808.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,542 characters)
From: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
To: '[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:45:39 +0000
Attachments: 2020-02-03,_JE,_6e_disclosure,_signed_order.pdf
To: '[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:45:39 +0000
Attachments: 2020-02-03,_JE,_6e_disclosure,_signed_order.pdf
Sorry, I think I found it. Attached.
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 5:44 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 5:44 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein
[Redacted]
Do you have a copy of the second 6(e) order from February that allowed Civil to review the additional trust agreements beyond those referenced in the order attached to [Redacted] email? I don't have a copy.
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
On Jun 29, 2020, at 2:13 PM, McEnany, John (USANYS) <[Redacted]> wrote:
Yes. We need to apply for a new order with an application that would discuss why we need to disclose; privacy concerns; potential protective orders; should we give notice to the people we got the trust agreements from (and if not why not), etc.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 2:05 PM
To: McEnany, John (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS)
Subject: FW: Epstein
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 2:05 PM
To: McEnany, John (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS)
Subject: FW: Epstein
This is the original order, which does seem to suggest we need "further order of the court" to further disclose.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS)
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 9:33 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 9:33 AM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein
Will come by in a second.
[Redacted]
Co-Chief, Public Corruption Unit
U.S. Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of New York
EFTA00029808
Co-Chief, Public Corruption Unit
U.S. Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of New York
EFTA00029808
Tel. [Redacted]
EFTA00029809
EFTA00029809
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document