HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016022.jpg

1.49 MB

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book page / evidence document
File Size: 1.49 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a scanned page (332) from a book titled 'Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?', included in a House Oversight Committee evidence production. The text discusses quantum mechanics, specifically photon polarization, and details Albert Einstein's objections to the theory, citing the 1935 'EPR paradox' paper co-authored with Podolsky and Rosen.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Einstein Physicist
Discussed regarding his discomfort with quantum mechanics and the EPR paradox.
Jacob Podolsky Physicist/Co-author
Co-authored the 'EPR' paradox paper with Einstein in 1935.
Samuel Rosen Physicist/Co-author
Co-authored the 'EPR' paradox paper with Einstein in 1935.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (1 events)

1935
Einstein wrote a paper with Jacob Podolsky and Samuel Rosen describing the 'EPR' paradox.
Unknown

Relationships (2)

Einstein Co-authors Jacob Podolsky
In 1935, Einstein wrote a paper with Jacob Podolsky...
Einstein Co-authors Samuel Rosen
In 1935, Einstein wrote a paper with... Samuel Rosen

Key Quotes (2)

"God does not play dice with the Universe."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016022.jpg
Quote #1
"Since faster than light communication was impossible – it breaks the law of special relativity – they concluded quantum mechanics must be wrong, or at least incomplete."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016022.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,210 characters)

332 Are the Androids Dreaming Yet?
[Image: Two landscape photographs showing a coastline or mudflats]
Effect of Polaroid Lenses
When scientists examine the polarization of these photons, they get random results. Sometimes the photon is oscillating side to side, sometimes up and down and sometimes part way in between. This can be determined simply by taking a lens out of a pair of Polaroid glasses, holding it up at an angle and seeing if the photon can pass through. Obviously laboratory grade Polaroid material is available, so scientists don’t have to destroy an expensive pair of designer glasses, but the principle is identical.
Very strange things happen when the measurements are made. The polarizations appear to have no discernible pattern, but once one of the photons has gone through a polarizer in the first town, its sister photon will always be found to have the opposite polarization (or the same if it was a type I)..
Einstein was uncomfortable with this for two reasons. The first related to his famous statement, “God does not play dice with the Universe.” He was deeply uncomfortable with the idea that the polarizations were random. Even more troubling to him was the idea that the sister photon somehow instantaneously had the opposite polarization. How would it know? For the sister photon to immediately have the opposite polarization, information would have to travel faster than the speed of light from the first photon to tell its sister what to do. In 1935, Einstein wrote a paper with Jacob Podolsky and Samuel Rosen describing this ‘EPR’ paradox. Since faster than light communication was impossible – it breaks the law of special relativity – they concluded quantum mechanics must be wrong, or at least incomplete. A deeper theory would be needed to explain the particles’ behavior. One very simple explanation is by analogy to socks! (Clothing analogies are one of the ways physicists try to make quantum mechanics less intimidating.)
Consider sister photons as if they were right and left socks. If we found a left sock on the bedroom floor, we would be unsurprised to find the matching sock was a right one. There is no need for messages to flow
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016022

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document