DOJ-OGR-00013172.jpg
554 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
554 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, for case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a discussion between the judge (The Court), Ms. Menninger, and Mr. Rohrbach about several procedural matters. Key topics include the low probability of calling a certain 'brother' as a witness, a past request from a November 23rd pretrial conference to share Dr. Rocchio's testimony with experts, and the government's request to speak with a witness named Jane about logistics after her testimony.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, addressing the court on several procedural issues.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the hearing and asking clarifying questions.
|
| MR. ROHRBACH | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, responding to the court and Ms. Menninger.
|
| Carolyn |
Mentioned in the header next to 'cross', likely referring to a cross-examination.
|
|
| Dr. Rocchio | Expert/Witness |
Mentioned in the context of sharing his testimony with two other experts.
|
| Jane | Witness |
A witness who was released from the stand, with whom the government requested to speak about logistical matters.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned as having asked for permission to speak with the witness Jane.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A court hearing where procedural matters were discussed between the judge and attorneys.
Courtroom
A final pretrial conference held on November 23rd where Ms. Menninger's side requested permission to share Dr. Rocchio's testimony with two experts.
Courtroom
Relationships (3)
Both are addressing the court as legal counsel in the same proceeding, indicating they are likely opposing attorneys in a case.
Ms. Menninger is an attorney arguing points and answering questions from the Judge (The Court) in a formal legal setting.
Mr. Rohrbach is an attorney responding to the Judge (The Court) in a formal legal setting.
Key Quotes (4)
"If I grant your motion, do you intend to call the brother?"Source
— THE COURT
(Asking Ms. Menninger about her plans for a witness if a motion is granted.)
DOJ-OGR-00013172.jpg
Quote #1
"It seems highly unlikely, your Honor."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Responding to the court's question about calling 'the brother' as a witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00013172.jpg
Quote #2
"One is you may recall that when we began at the final pretrial conference on November 23rd, we specifically requested permission to share Dr. Rocchio's testimony with our two experts because we believed that this issue precluded otherwise witnesses listening in or finding out about the testimony of other witnesses, one."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Recounting a previous request made during a pretrial conference regarding expert testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00013172.jpg
Quote #3
"And then the second point is when Jane was released from the stand and the government asked for permission to speak with her about logistical matters, I said at that time, so long as she's admonished that she's not to"Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Describing a second procedural issue concerning communication with a witness who had testified.)
DOJ-OGR-00013172.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,374 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 159 of 264 1585
LC7VMAX5 Carolyn - cross
LC7VMAX5 Carolyn - cross
1 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.
2 THE COURT: Right?
3 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes.
4 THE COURT: Okay. In other words, let's put it this
5 way: If I grant your motion, do you intend to call the
6 brother?
7 MS. MENNINGER: It seems highly unlikely, your Honor.
8 THE COURT: Okay.
9 MS. MENNINGER: But, your Honor, two very quick
10 factual issues. One is you may recall that when we began at
11 the final pretrial conference on November 23rd, we specifically
12 requested permission to share Dr. Rocchio's testimony with our
13 two experts because we believed that this issue precluded
14 otherwise witnesses listening in or finding out about the
15 testimony of other witnesses, one.
16 The second point is --
17 THE COURT: And I said talk it out, confer, and then
18 brief me if you have disagreement. I received no briefing.
19 MS. MENNINGER: I think there was no objection to that
20 process, your Honor.
21 MR. ROHRBACH: There was no objection.
22 MS. MENNINGER: And then the second point is when Jane
23 was released from the stand and the government asked for
24 permission to speak with her about logistical matters, I said
25 at that time, so long as she's admonished that she's not to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013172
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document