This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, in which an attorney, Mr. Rohrbach, argues against a defendant's motion to dismiss charges of enticement. Rohrbach asserts that the defendant, along with an individual named Epstein, manipulated a victim named Jane by building a relationship with her over several years, ultimately persuading her to travel to New York. The argument centers on the idea that playing on Jane's 'hopes and desires' fits the legal definition of enticement, justifying the charges.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceedings, addressed as 'Your Honor'.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Attorney |
Speaking before the court, arguing against the defendant's motion.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
A person whose testimony is being discussed. She traveled to New York in the context of a relationship with the defen...
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney |
Mentioned by Mr. Rohrbach as taking a 'very narrow view' on the case, likely representing the defendant.
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as someone who, along with the defendant, built a relationship with Jane.
|
|
| defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the motion regarding 'Counts One and Two'. Accused of enticing Jane to travel to New York.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The destination of Jane's travel, which is central to the enticement charges.
|
"Your Honor, the Court should deny the defendant's motion as to Counts One and Two."Source
"Jane was not in New York by accident. In fact, there's no nonsexualized purpose that's been articulated at this point for Jane to travel to New York."Source
""Enticement" is defined as using hope and desire."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,480 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document