DOJ-OGR-00018568.jpg

503 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 503 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Maguire. The questioning focuses on photographs of a house taken on July 6th and 7th, 2019, and whether they could represent the house's condition in 1994. Maguire confirms he has no knowledge of the house's appearance before 2019, the year he first entered it to execute a search warrant.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Maguire Witness
A witness undergoing cross-examination regarding photographs of a house.
MS. MOE Attorney
An attorney who makes an objection during the cross-examination of Maguire.
THE COURT Judge
The presiding court official who overrules an objection made by Ms. Moe.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding, listed at the bottom of the page.

Timeline (4 events)

2019
Execution of a search warrant by the witness, Maguire. This occurred 25 years after 1994.
A house/residence
2019-07-06
Photographs were taken of a house.
A house/residence
2019-07-07
Photographs were taken of a house.
A house/residence
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Maguire in court, as part of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Courtroom (implied)
Maguire MS. MOE THE COURT Unnamed Questioner

Locations (1)

Location Context
The subject of photographs and questioning, specifically its appearance in 2019 versus 1994.

Relationships (2)

Unnamed Questioner Professional/Adversarial Maguire
The document is a transcript of a cross-examination, where the questioner is challenging the witness, Maguire.
MS. MOE Professional Maguire
MS. MOE makes an objection during the questioning of Maguire, indicating she is likely legal counsel representing Maguire or a party aligned with him.

Key Quotes (3)

"So those photos show what the house looked like on July 6th, 2019, and July 7th, 2019; isn't that right?"
Source
— Unnamed Questioner (Establishing the date and subject of the photographs under discussion.)
DOJ-OGR-00018568.jpg
Quote #1
"Those photographs don't show, for example, what the house looked like in 1994?"
Source
— Unnamed Questioner (Questioning the witness about whether the 2019 photos can represent the house's condition in 1994.)
DOJ-OGR-00018568.jpg
Quote #2
"I have no way of knowing what the residence looked like, so I don't know if they were representative of what they looked like at that time period in the '90s."
Source
— Maguire (The witness's response, stating their lack of knowledge about the house's appearance prior to their first visit in 2019.)
DOJ-OGR-00018568.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,235 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 231 of 261 1392
LC6Cmax7
Maguire - cross
1 A. Yes, sir.
2 Q. So that's the day that the photos that we looked at were
3 taken?
4 A. Yes, sir.
5 Q. So those photos show what the house looked like on July
6 6th, 2019, and July 7th, 2019; isn't that right?
7 A. Yes, sir.
8 Q. Those photographs don't show, for example, what the house
9 looked like in 1994?
10 A. No, sir, they don't. Not to my knowledge.
11 Q. Not to your knowledge, right, because you weren't in the
12 house in 1994; right?
13 A. I would hope not, no, sir.
14 Q. That was the first time you had ever been there?
15 A. It was.
16 Q. Those photographs wouldn't show what the house looked like
17 at any time prior to 2019 when you went inside the house;
18 right?
19 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor.
20 THE COURT: Overruled.
21 A. I have no way of knowing what the residence looked like, so
22 I don't know if they were representative of what they looked
23 like at that time period in the '90s.
24 Q. The specific year I asked about was 1994, that would be 25
25 years before the day that you executed the search warrant;
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018568

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document