DOJ-OGR-00016572.jpg
470 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
470 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing the direct examination of a witness named Espinosa. Espinosa confirms having a videoconference with the government in November 2020. The questioning then shifts to Espinosa's employment with Ghislaine Maxwell from 1996 to 2002, during which Espinosa denies ever seeing or being told that Maxwell was pregnant.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Espinosa | Witness |
The person being questioned under direct examination.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Former Employer |
Subject of questioning; the witness worked for her from 1996 to 2002.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney |
Makes an objection during the questioning.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Rules on an objection, stating "Overruled."
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Appears at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service.
|
| the government | government agency |
The witness had a videoconference with the government in November 2020 regarding the case.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2020-11
A videoconference between the witness, Espinosa, and the government.
2022-08-10
Direct examination of witness Espinosa in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
Relationships (1)
The document states that Espinosa worked for Ghislaine Maxwell from 1996 to 2002.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,075 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 89 of 246 2384
LCGVMAX3
Espinosa - direct
LCGVMAX3
Espinosa - direct
1 videoconference with the government?
2 A. Last year, I think. So repeat your question please.
3 Q. Does that refresh your recollection of when you had this
4 videoconference for the first time with the government?
5 A. Yes, well, there's a date on here.
6 Q. And does that generally refresh your recollection about
7 when this would have happened?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Okay. And when did that happen?
10 A. November 2020.
11 Q. Okay. All right.
12 Was that the only time you spoke to the government in
13 this case?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. Okay. Question about Ghislaine. In the time that you
16 worked for Ghislaine Maxwell from 1996 to 2002, did you ever
17 see Ms. Maxwell pregnant?
18 A. No.
19 Q. Ever were told that Ms. Maxwell was pregnant?
20 A. No.
21 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
22 THE COURT: Overruled.
23 Q. Ms. Espinosa, you said you left the job in roughly 2002; is
24 that right?
25 A. Correct.
2 A. Last year, I think. So repeat your question please.
3 Q. Does that refresh your recollection of when you had this
4 videoconference for the first time with the government?
5 A. Yes, well, there's a date on here.
6 Q. And does that generally refresh your recollection about
7 when this would have happened?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. Okay. And when did that happen?
10 A. November 2020.
11 Q. Okay. All right.
12 Was that the only time you spoke to the government in
13 this case?
14 A. Yes.
15 Q. Okay. Question about Ghislaine. In the time that you
16 worked for Ghislaine Maxwell from 1996 to 2002, did you ever
17 see Ms. Maxwell pregnant?
18 A. No.
19 Q. Ever were told that Ms. Maxwell was pregnant?
20 A. No.
21 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
22 THE COURT: Overruled.
23 Q. Ms. Espinosa, you said you left the job in roughly 2002; is
24 that right?
25 A. Correct.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016572
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document