DOJ-OGR-00013211.jpg
536 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
536 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Mr. Pagliuca argues that a legal complaint is inconsistent due to factual omissions, specifically citing that paragraph 8 fails to mention the witness's testimony of being subjected to penetration and intercourse by Epstein. The judge acknowledges this "omission theory" and states an intention to hear from a Ms. Comey on the matter.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a cross-examination ("Carolyn - cross").
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript, questioning Mr. Pagliuca.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
A speaker in the transcript, responding to the court's questions about a complaint.
|
| Ms. Maxwell |
Mentioned by Mr. Pagliuca in line 6, but he is cut off before elaborating.
|
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned by Mr. Pagliuca as the perpetrator of acts against the witness.
|
|
| Kellen |
Mentioned by Mr. Pagliuca in line 18, context is unclear.
|
|
| Ms. Comey |
Mentioned by the Court, who states they will hear from her regarding the "omission theory".
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn, during which an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca, discusses his theory of inconsistency based on omissions in a complaint with the judge.
Relationships (3)
The document is a transcript of a formal dialogue between an attorney (Mr. Pagliuca) and a judge (The Court) during a legal proceeding.
Mr. Pagliuca states that the witness (Carolyn) testified that "she was the subject of penetration and intercourse by Epstein."
The document header indicates a cross-examination of Carolyn ("Carolyn - cross"), and Mr. Pagliuca is acting as an attorney in the proceeding.
Key Quotes (2)
"Well, these are all omissions, your Honor, factual. So paragraph 8, for example, the witness has testified now that she was the subject of penetration and intercourse by Epstein. Paragraph 8 does not include that."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Explaining to the court his theory that the inconsistency in the complaint is an omission of fact.)
DOJ-OGR-00013211.jpg
Quote #1
"Is there any other? I understand your omission theory, I'll hear from Ms. Comey on that in a second, I do have a question for you on it, and I need to read the"Source
— THE COURT
(Responding to Mr. Pagliuca's argument, acknowledging the theory, and indicating the next steps in the proceeding.)
DOJ-OGR-00013211.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,343 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 198 of 264 1639
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
1 things that are in the complaint.
2 THE COURT: So that's a long way of getting to my --
3 responding to my first question.
4 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
5 THE COURT: What paragraph is inconsistent?
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, the fact that Ms. Maxwell --
7 THE COURT: Point me to a paragraph.
8 MR. PAGLIUCA: All of the paragraphs, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: On the same theory you just pronounced?
10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
11 THE COURT: So then on your second theory, can you
12 point to any inconsistency?
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, these are all omissions, your
14 Honor, factual. So paragraph 8, for example, the witness has
15 testified now that she was the subject of penetration and
16 intercourse by Epstein. Paragraph 8 does not include that.
17 Paragraph 9, I think, is an expansion. We have only
18 Kellen, often calling -- excuse me. 11A is what I'm looking
19 at.
20 THE COURT: So other than the omission theory, is
21 there an inconsistency you're pointing to?
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: No.
23 THE COURT: Is there any other? I understand your
24 omission theory, I'll hear from Ms. Comey on that in a second,
25 I do have a question for you on it, and I need to read the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013211
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document