DOJ-OGR-00003078.jpg
754 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
754 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on April 16, 2021, provides the factual background for a case, detailing how Virginia Roberts Giuffre joined a lawsuit concerning a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein. Giuffre alleged that the defendant was a "primary co-conspirator" who procured underage girls for Epstein and participated in sexual abuse. The document cites Giuffre's specific allegations that the defendant persuaded her to go to Epstein's mansion and was involved in a sexual encounter there.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in relation to a non-prosecution agreement and as the central figure in a scheme involving the defendant an...
|
|
| Virginia Roberts Giuffre | Petitioner/Alleged Victim |
Moved to join a petition under the CVRA, and made allegations against the defendant and Epstein.
|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned in the case name 'Giuffre v. Maxwell', likely the defendant being discussed in the document.
|
| Ross Gow | Spokesman for the defendant |
A spokesman for the defendant who made a statement to the press.
|
| Doe | Petitioner |
A placeholder name for anonymous petitioners in the case 'Doe v. United States'.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USAO-SDFL | government agency |
Entered into a non-prosecution agreement with Epstein.
|
| Government | government agency |
Mentioned as the prosecuting party that expects to prove the defendant's answers were false.
|
| United States | government |
Named as a party in the case 'Doe v. United States'.
|
Timeline (5 events)
2014-12-30
Virginia Roberts Giuffre moved to join the petition, alleging her CVRA rights were also violated.
2015-01-02
Giuffre filed a corrected motion in the case Doe, No. 08 Civ. 80736.
2015-04-07
The court ordered the filing of a redacted version of Giuffre's corrected motion.
The court
Giuffre alleged that when she began giving Epstein a massage, he and the defendant turned it into a sexual encounter.
Epstein's mansion
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where Giuffre alleged the defendant persuaded her to go.
|
Relationships (3)
The document states Giuffre described the defendant as a "'primary co-conspirator' with Epstein in his scheme" and "'one of the main women' Epstein used to 'procure under-aged girls for sexual activities.'"
Giuffre alleged that the defendant persuaded her to go to Epstein's mansion and participated in turning a massage into a sexual encounter.
The document identifies Ross Gow as "a spokesman for the defendant."
Key Quotes (5)
"one of the main women’ Epstein used to ‘procure under-aged girls for sexual activities,"Source
— Virginia Roberts Giuffre
(A description of the defendant in Giuffre's motion for joinder.)
DOJ-OGR-00003078.jpg
Quote #1
"primary co-conspirator’ with Epstein in his scheme."Source
— Virginia Roberts Giuffre
(A description of the defendant in Giuffre's motion for joinder.)
DOJ-OGR-00003078.jpg
Quote #2
"‘persuaded’ [her] to go to Epstein’s mansion,"Source
— Virginia Roberts Giuffre
(An allegation made by Giuffre against the defendant.)
DOJ-OGR-00003078.jpg
Quote #3
"when Giuffre began giving Epstein a massage, [he] and [the defendant] ‘turned it into a sexual encounter.’"Source
— Virginia Roberts Giuffre
(An allegation made by Giuffre against Epstein and the defendant.)
DOJ-OGR-00003078.jpg
Quote #4
"‘participat[ed] in the sexual abuse’"Source
— Virginia Roberts Giuffre
(An allegation made by Giuffre that the defendant participated in the sexual abuse of others.)
DOJ-OGR-00003078.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,246 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 204 Filed 04/16/21 Page 144 of 239
trial record—that the questions were fundamentally ambiguous, and the defendant’s answers were truthful and immaterial. (Def. Mot. 5). To the contrary, the Government expects to prove at trial that the defendant understood the questions and that her answers were both false and materially so. This case does not present the narrow circumstances in which a court can and should dismiss perjury counts, let alone do so before trial.
A. Factual Background
On July 7, 2008, following the USAO-SDFL entering into the non-prosecution agreement with Epstein, two minors filed a petition under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S.C. § 3771, alleging that the prosecutors violated their rights under that statute. See Doe v. United States, 08 Civ. 80736 (S.D.F.L.). See generally Doe No. 1. v. United States, 749 F.3d 999, 1002 (11th Cir. 2014) (describing the background of the suit). On December 30, 2014, Virginia Roberts Giuffre moved to join the petition, alleging that the USAO-SDFL had also violated her CVRA rights. See Doe, No. 08 Civ. 80736, Dkt. No. 279.45 In her motion for joinder, Giuffre described the defendant as “ʻone of the main women’ Epstein used to ‘procure under-aged girls for sexual activities,’” and as a “ʻprimary co-conspirator’ with Epstein in his scheme. See Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 18-2868 (2d Cir. 2019), Dkt. No. 287 at 10 (containing the unsealed summary judgment opinion from 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP)). Among other allegations, Giuffre alleged that the defendant “ʻpersuaded’ [her] to go to Epstein’s mansion,” and, “when Giuffre began giving Epstein a massage, [he] and [the defendant] ‘turned it into a sexual encounter.’” Id. at 11. Giuffre alleged that the defendant also “ʻparticipat[ed] in the sexual abuse’” of others. Id. A few days later, the press reported a statement by a spokesman for the defendant, Ross Gow. Among other things,
45 Giuffre filed a corrected motion on January 2, 2015. See Doe, No. 08 Civ. 80736, Dkt. No. 280. The court later struck the original motion, sealed the corrected motion, and ordered filing of a redacted version of the corrected motion. See id., Dkt. No. 325 (Apr. 7, 2015).
117
DOJ-OGR-00003078
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document