DOJ-OGR-00013464.jpg
491 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
491 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Rodgers. The questioning focuses on Rodgers' personal practice as a pilot of transcribing passenger names from manifests into a personal logbook. It also explores how Rodgers would record passengers whose names were unknown, using placeholders like "one passenger" or "one PAX," and sometimes noting their gender.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rodgers | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined. Provides the answers ('A.') in the transcript.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting agency that produced the transcript.
|
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of a cross-examination where an unnamed individual is questioning Rodgers in a formal, legal setting.
Key Quotes (4)
"You had a practice, I think you described this, of taking the manifests and then taking the names of the passengers and entering them in your own personal pilot logbook, right?"Source
— Questioner
(A question describing the witness's procedure for logging passenger information.)
DOJ-OGR-00013464.jpg
Quote #1
"But that's your particular practice; it's not what every pilot does, right?"Source
— Questioner
(A question clarifying that the witness's logging method is a personal habit and not a universal standard for pilots.)
DOJ-OGR-00013464.jpg
Quote #2
"And if you didn't know their names, you might put in something like "one passenger" or "one PAX" to indicate an unnamed passenger?"Source
— Questioner
(A question about how the witness would log passengers whose names were unknown.)
DOJ-OGR-00013464.jpg
Quote #3
"And then later you might have put -- or around the same time you might have put "one female" or "one male" to indicate the gender, right?"Source
— Questioner
(A question about the witness's practice of noting the gender of unnamed passengers.)
DOJ-OGR-00013464.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,220 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 186 of 262 1897
LC8VMAX6
Rodgers - cross
LC8VMAX6
Rodgers - cross
1 A. That's right.
2 Q. That is not a passenger manifest, right?
3 A. No, it is not.
4 Q. You had a practice, I think you described this, of taking
5 the manifests and then taking the names of the passengers and
6 entering them in your own personal pilot logbook, right?
7 A. Correct.
8 Q. So that's why your logbook has those -- that information in
9 it, right?
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. But that's your particular practice; it's not what every
12 pilot does, right?
13 A. Correct.
14 Q. Okay. Now, you said on direct that if you didn't get all
15 the names of the passengers, which happened from time to time,
16 you would still try to keep track of how many passengers there
17 were?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. And if you didn't know their names, you might put in
20 something like "one passenger" or "one PAX" to indicate an
21 unnamed passenger?
22 A. Correct.
23 Q. And then later you might have put -- or around the same
24 time you might have put "one female" or "one male" to indicate
25 the gender, right?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013464
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document