This document is a transcript of a court proceeding, specifically the opening statement by defense attorney Ms. Sternheim in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell. Sternheim argues that the jury must focus solely on Maxwell's alleged actions, not Epstein's, and contends the government's case is built on the unreliable testimony of four accusers whose memories have been corrupted over time and who are motivated by money.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney |
Identified as the speaker giving the opening statement.
|
| Epstein |
Mentioned in the context of his conduct and crimes, which the speaker argues are separate from the defendant's.
|
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
The person being represented by the legal team. The opening statement is about the charges against her.
|
| Christian Everdell | Attorney / Colleague |
Named as one of the speaker's colleagues representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Laura Menninger | Attorney / Colleague |
Named as one of the speaker's colleagues representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Jeffrey Pagliuca | Attorney / Colleague |
Named as one of the speaker's colleagues representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the document.
|
"But you are not here to judge whether Epstein committed the crimes, you are not here to judge whether the government could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Epstein committed the crimes - you are here to determine whether the government can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Ghislaine Maxwell has committed the crimes charged."Source
"This case is about memory, manipulation, and money."Source
"The government's proof, the government's story relies on the claims of four accusers, four who will say that Ghislaine prepared them or - to use a term that you will hear"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,590 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document