DOJ-OGR-00018269.jpg
568 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
568 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a discussion between attorneys Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey and the judge regarding the proper procedure for redacting video evidence to protect witness anonymity and third-party privacy. Ms. Comey also raises a technical concern that the timestamps on the redacted video will not align with the official transcripts.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney (implied) |
Speaker in the court transcript, addressing the court regarding redactions.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, providing direction on how to handle redactions and evidence.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney (implied) |
Speaker in the court transcript, addressing the court and noting a technical issue with redacted video.
|
| Parkinson | Subject of direct examination |
Mentioned in the header as "Parkinson - Direct", indicating this person is likely a witness or party undergoing direc...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion took place regarding the procedure for redacting video evidence, including the language to use for redactions and addressing technical issues with timestamps.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (2)
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the judge as "your Honor" and they are discussing legal procedures for handling evidence.
Key Quotes (4)
"I think we could say, "under seal, witness," or "under seal, third-party," and I think that gets to the heart of the matter."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Proposing language to be used for redacting evidence to protect individuals.)
DOJ-OGR-00018269.jpg
Quote #1
"if it is privacy interests of a third party -- for example, the photograph of a prepubescent girl, you'll say, "seal, third-party privacy.""Source
— THE COURT
(Giving specific instructions on how to label redactions based on the reason for privacy.)
DOJ-OGR-00018269.jpg
Quote #2
"the timestamps of the redacted version just won't line up with the transcripts here."Source
— MS. COMEY
(Raising a technical issue about the discrepancy between the redacted video and the court transcripts.)
DOJ-OGR-00018269.jpg
Quote #3
"My understanding is that's not feasible with the technology that"Source
— MS. COMEY
(Responding to the court's question about showing a blank screen, indicating a technological limitation.)
DOJ-OGR-00018269.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,423 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 168 of 236
LC3KMAX6 Parkinson - Direct 1072
LC3KMAX6 Parkinson - Direct 1072
1 MR. PAGLIUCA: I totally respect that, your Honor.
2 And I think we could say, "under seal, witness," or "under
3 seal, third-party," and I think that gets to the heart of the
4 matter.
5 THE COURT: Okay. I think that's fine.
6 So, either to protect the anonymity of someone who I
7 permitted to testify under a pseudonym, you'll say, "under
8 seal, witness"; and if it is privacy interests of a third party
9 -- for example, the photograph of a prepubescent girl, you'll
10 say, "seal, third-party privacy."
11 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor.
12 The one thing I will note that just came to mind about
13 the redacted version of the video is that the timestamps of the
14 redacted version just won't line up with the transcripts here.
15 I don't think there's really a way to fix that, but I just
16 wanted to note that.
17 THE COURT: Well, that's fine. The full video is
18 admitted into evidence, so for purposes of the record, those
19 timestamps will match up. To the extent the public wants to
20 follow the timestamps on the redacted version, it will be
21 slightly off.
22 Is there a way to just show a blank screen or
23 something?
24 MS. COMEY: I asked the same thing, your Honor. My
25 understanding is that's not feasible with the technology that
2 And I think we could say, "under seal, witness," or "under
3 seal, third-party," and I think that gets to the heart of the
4 matter.
5 THE COURT: Okay. I think that's fine.
6 So, either to protect the anonymity of someone who I
7 permitted to testify under a pseudonym, you'll say, "under
8 seal, witness"; and if it is privacy interests of a third party
9 -- for example, the photograph of a prepubescent girl, you'll
10 say, "seal, third-party privacy."
11 MS. COMEY: Yes, your Honor.
12 The one thing I will note that just came to mind about
13 the redacted version of the video is that the timestamps of the
14 redacted version just won't line up with the transcripts here.
15 I don't think there's really a way to fix that, but I just
16 wanted to note that.
17 THE COURT: Well, that's fine. The full video is
18 admitted into evidence, so for purposes of the record, those
19 timestamps will match up. To the extent the public wants to
20 follow the timestamps on the redacted version, it will be
21 slightly off.
22 Is there a way to just show a blank screen or
23 something?
24 MS. COMEY: I asked the same thing, your Honor. My
25 understanding is that's not feasible with the technology that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018269
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document