DOJ-OGR-00016880.jpg
554 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
554 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge and several attorneys (Menninger, Everdell, Sternheim, and Moe). The discussion clarifies that a 'short matter' scheduled for the following Monday is the testimony of a witness from London. A potential issue is raised by Ms. Moe, who states that the witness's name was not on the witness list provided to the government.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, questioning the attorneys about a matter scheduled for Monday.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney |
An attorney responding to the Court's questions, identifying the Monday matter as a witness from London.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Attorney |
An attorney confirming Ms. Menninger's statement and clarifying his previous communication with the Court.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney |
An attorney confirming the plan to finish with the witness on Monday before closings.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney |
An attorney, likely for the government, raising a concern that the witness's name was not on the witness list provide...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| the government | government agency |
Mentioned as the recipient of a witness list, which allegedly did not include the witness from London.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion in court to clarify the schedule and witnesses for an upcoming day of the trial.
Courtroom
Monday (relative to 2022-08-10)
A planned event to have a 'short witness' from London testify before closing arguments.
Courtroom
witness from London
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location from which a witness is expected to testify.
|
Relationships (4)
Ms. Menninger addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and responds to the Court's direct questions in a legal proceeding.
Mr. Everdell addresses the Court as 'your Honor' and refers to a prior discussion with the Court.
Ms. Sternheim addresses the Court as 'Judge' while participating in the legal discussion.
Key Quotes (2)
"I think it's the witness from London, your Honor, that you discussed with Mr. Everdell earlier."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Identifying the 'short matter' that the Court was asking about.)
DOJ-OGR-00016880.jpg
Quote #1
"If they were aware of this witness yesterday, that name was not on the witness list provided to the government,"Source
— MS. MOE
(Raising a potential procedural issue regarding the disclosure of the witness from London.)
DOJ-OGR-00016880.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,704 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 151 of 197
LCHCmax5
2692
LCHCmax5
2692
1 THE COURT: Okay. I will look at it and see what the
2 request is.
3 The issue that you noted last night, Ms. Menninger,
4 that you said needed to be done on Monday, what is that? There
5 was something last night when we talked about the defense would
6 likely finish today, you caveated that there was one small
7 short matter that would be done on Monday, and I don't think I
8 know what that is.
9 MS. MENNINGER: I think it's the witness from London,
10 your Honor, that you discussed with Mr. Everdell earlier.
11 MR. EVERDELL: I believe that's what we were referring
12 to.
13 THE COURT: I didn't realize that.
14 MR. EVERDELL: I thought I actually said, your Honor,
15 another witness, a short witness that we might need to put on
16 on Monday.
17 THE COURT: That's the same as what you caveated?
18 MS. MENNINGER: Yes.
19 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes, Judge. That's when I said that
20 we would make sure that we were finished so that we could go
21 right into the closings.
22 MS. MOE: Your Honor, on that score, I did not realize
23 that that was the same witness we were talking about this
24 morning. If they were aware of this witness yesterday, that
25 name was not on the witness list provided to the government,
2 request is.
3 The issue that you noted last night, Ms. Menninger,
4 that you said needed to be done on Monday, what is that? There
5 was something last night when we talked about the defense would
6 likely finish today, you caveated that there was one small
7 short matter that would be done on Monday, and I don't think I
8 know what that is.
9 MS. MENNINGER: I think it's the witness from London,
10 your Honor, that you discussed with Mr. Everdell earlier.
11 MR. EVERDELL: I believe that's what we were referring
12 to.
13 THE COURT: I didn't realize that.
14 MR. EVERDELL: I thought I actually said, your Honor,
15 another witness, a short witness that we might need to put on
16 on Monday.
17 THE COURT: That's the same as what you caveated?
18 MS. MENNINGER: Yes.
19 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes, Judge. That's when I said that
20 we would make sure that we were finished so that we could go
21 right into the closings.
22 MS. MOE: Your Honor, on that score, I did not realize
23 that that was the same witness we were talking about this
24 morning. If they were aware of this witness yesterday, that
25 name was not on the witness list provided to the government,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016880
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document