DOJ-OGR-00019615.jpg
597 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
5
Events
2
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
597 KB
Summary
This legal document, dated October 2, 2020, outlines a series of events in a criminal case against a defendant named Maxwell. It details that on July 30, 2020, Judge Nathan issued a protective order preventing criminal discovery materials from being used in civil litigation, and on September 2, 2020, denied Maxwell's motion to modify this order. Consequently, Maxwell filed a notice of appeal on September 4, 2020.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein |
Mentioned as the individual Maxwell allegedly helped to recruit, groom, and abuse minor victims.
|
|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
The subject of the indictment, accused of helping Epstein and attempting to cover up her crimes. She is the party who...
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
The judge who entered a protective order in Maxwell's criminal case and later denied her motion to modify it.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | Government agency |
The prosecuting party in the criminal case against Maxwell, which produced discovery materials under a protective order.
|
| Southern District of New York | Judicial body |
The court where the indictment against Maxwell was filed.
|
Timeline (5 events)
2020-06-29
Indictment 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) was filed under seal in the Southern District of New York.
Southern District of New York
2020-07-30
Judge Nathan entered a protective order governing the disclosure of information in the criminal case against Maxwell.
2020-09-02
Judge Nathan denied Maxwell's motion to modify the Protective Order.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location where the indictment was filed under seal.
|
Relationships (2)
The document states that the Indictment alleges Maxwell helped Epstein to recruit, groom, and ultimately abuse minor victims.
Judge Nathan is the judge presiding over legal matters involving Maxwell, including entering a protective order and denying her motion.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,465 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 82, 10/02/2020, 2944267, Page8 of 37
2
girls by, among other things, helping Epstein to re-
cruit, groom, and ultimately abuse minor victims. The
Indictment further alleges that in or about 2016, Max-
well attempted to cover up her crimes by lying under
oath about her role in Epstein’s scheme.
cruit, groom, and ultimately abuse minor victims. The
Indictment further alleges that in or about 2016, Max-
well attempted to cover up her crimes by lying under
oath about her role in Epstein’s scheme.
On July 30, 2020, upon the Government’s applica-
tion, Judge Nathan entered a protective order govern-
ing the parties’ disclosure of information produced to
Maxwell by the Government in discovery in the crimi-
nal case (the “Protective Order”). The Protective Or-
der, among other things, prohibits the use of criminal
discovery materials in civil litigation. Three weeks
later, Maxwell moved to modify the Protective Order
to allow Maxwell to use confidential criminal discovery
materials, which were produced to Maxwell by the
Government, in filings Maxwell intended to submit in
separate civil litigation.
tion, Judge Nathan entered a protective order govern-
ing the parties’ disclosure of information produced to
Maxwell by the Government in discovery in the crimi-
nal case (the “Protective Order”). The Protective Or-
der, among other things, prohibits the use of criminal
discovery materials in civil litigation. Three weeks
later, Maxwell moved to modify the Protective Order
to allow Maxwell to use confidential criminal discovery
materials, which were produced to Maxwell by the
Government, in filings Maxwell intended to submit in
separate civil litigation.
Judge Nathan denied Maxwell’s motion on Septem-
ber 2, 2020, holding, among other things, that Maxwell
had failed to establish good cause to modify the Protec-
tive Order and failed to coherently explain how the
criminal discovery materials related to any argument
Maxwell intended to make in the civil litigation.
ber 2, 2020, holding, among other things, that Maxwell
had failed to establish good cause to modify the Protec-
tive Order and failed to coherently explain how the
criminal discovery materials related to any argument
Maxwell intended to make in the civil litigation.
Maxwell filed a notice of appeal on September 4,
2020.
2020.
Statement of Facts
A. The Indictment
On June 29, 2020, Indictment 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) was
filed under seal in the Southern District of New York,
filed under seal in the Southern District of New York,
DOJ-OGR-00019615
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document