EFTA00024921.pdf

66.7 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 66.7 KB
Summary

An email chain from November 17-18, 2021, involving U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) staff and contractors discussing the logistics of obtaining 'courtroom connect' (internet access) for legal proceedings presided over by Judge Nathan (likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial). The correspondence details the necessity of obtaining a signed order from the judge to proceed with technical installation before Thanksgiving, referencing a similar previous application made to Judge Kaplan.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Judge Nathan Judge
Judge presiding over the case; request for courtroom connect needs to be submitted to her.
Judge Kaplan Judge
Mentioned as a judge who received a previous application for courtroom connect.
Mark USANYS Employee
Recipient/Sender in the email chain; asked to provide a previous application sent to Judge Kaplan.
Unidentified Paralegal Specialist Paralegal Specialist
Sender of the initial email (bottom of chain), works for US Attorney's Office SDNY.

Timeline (2 events)

2021-11-17
Drafting of Courtroom Connect Letter
SDNY
USANYS Staff
2021-11-25
Thanksgiving (Deadline context for tech check)
US

Relationships (1)

Judge Nathan Judicial Authority USANYS Staff
USANYS staff preparing request order for Judge Nathan.

Key Quotes (3)

"He said that getting courtroom connect is not going to happen without a signed order from the judge."
Source
EFTA00024921.pdf
Quote #1
"Would it be possible to submit a proposed order and request to Judge Nathan soon, tonight or tomorrow?"
Source
EFTA00024921.pdf
Quote #2
"I think we should try and send such a letter/proposed order tomorrow (to ideally get it approved as soon as possible and a tech check scheduled for before Thanksgiving)."
Source
EFTA00024921.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,381 characters)

From: [Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor]" <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; "[Redacted] (USANYS)"
<[Redacted]>; "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Courtroom connect
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2021 01:34:14 +0000
Attachments: 2021-11-17_Courtroom_Connect_Letter.docx
Following up on this actually, I just spoke with [Redacted], who is requesting courtroom connect for [Redacted] (and he did for NCAA
also). He said that getting courtroom connect is not going to happen without a signed order from the judge. He
recommended getting it submitted sooner rather than later to leave time for logistics to be worked out. Would it be
possible to submit a proposed order and request to Judge Nathan soon, tonight or tomorrow? I've drafted one (attached)
using the language [Redacted] used in his, which I forwarded below. Let me know what you think or if you need anything from me,
thanks.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor]
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 6:23 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted]
<[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: FW: Courtroom connect
FYI, I am going to check in with [Redacted] tomorrow about the procedure for courtroom connect internet (I flagged it for
her yesterday but forgot to check in this afternoon), but it looks like we will need to send a letter and proposed order to
the judge to approve it before coordinating with the tech folks who install and make it happen. If this is in fact what we
need to do, which I'll again check with [Redacted] about tomorrow, I think we should try and send such a letter/proposed
order tomorrow (to ideally get it approved as soon as possible and a tech check scheduled for before Thanksgiving).
From: Mark, [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 5:59 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Courtroom connect
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) [Contractor] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 17, 2021 5:58 PM
To: Mark, [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Courtroom connect
Hey [Redacted],
When you get a chance could you please send me the application you sent to Judge Kaplan to get courtroom connect
approved?
Thanks,
[Redacted]
Paralegal Specialist
U.S. Attorney's Office | SDNY
EFTA00024921
[Redacted]
New York, NY 10007
Office: [Redacted]
Cell: [Redacted]
EFTA00024922

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document