This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a procedural discussion between two attorneys, Mr. Pagliuca and Ms. Comey, and the judge regarding which portion of a prior testimony a witness should read. The central point of contention is a question and answer where the witness apparently admitted to using cocaine at Mr. Epstein's house.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn |
Mentioned in the header next to 'cross', likely indicating a cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the proceedings.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, questioning a witness and addressing the court.
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court and Mr. Pagliuca regarding admissible testimony.
|
| Mr. Epstein |
Mentioned in a question being read to a witness regarding cocaine use at his house.
|
|
| THE WITNESS | Witness |
Speaker in the transcript, being questioned by Mr. Pagliuca.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where a witness allegedly used cocaine.
|
"Looking at line 7 on page 105, does it refresh your memory that you answered the question: Yes, but I have done cocaine at Mr. Epstein's house also?"Source
"Your Honor, I think the only potentially admissible portion of this might be on pages 105 through 106."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,284 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document