DOJ-OGR-00018301.jpg
543 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
543 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Parkinson. The questioning attorney successfully establishes that video and photographic evidence of a house, taken on October 20, 2005, is limited to showing the state of the house and its contents (including artwork) only on that specific date. The witness concurs that this evidence provides no information about what was in the house on any prior day.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Parkinson | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined ("Parkinson - cross") and is the individual providing the ...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript page, likely the court reporting firm that produced the document.
|
Relationships (1)
The document is a transcript of a formal cross-examination in a legal proceeding, where one individual (Q) is questioning the other (A, Parkinson) as a witness.
Key Quotes (4)
"That's one of the best questions I've had in 55 years. If I do find out, I'll let you know."Source
— Parkinson
(The witness's response when asked if videos or photos could show the contents of a house on a day prior to when they were taken.)
DOJ-OGR-00018301.jpg
Quote #1
"No, sir, I don't believe science has gotten that far."Source
— Parkinson
(The witness's response when asked if a video or photograph could show what items were in a house prior to the day it was recorded.)
DOJ-OGR-00018301.jpg
Quote #2
"So bottom line is, we have no idea from what we looked at in your testimony what the house looked like prior to October 20th of 2005?"Source
— Unnamed Questioner
(The questioner's summary of the point being made during the cross-examination.)
DOJ-OGR-00018301.jpg
Quote #3
"I certainly don't."Source
— Parkinson
(The witness's agreement with the questioner's summary that the evidence does not show what the house looked like before October 20, 2005.)
DOJ-OGR-00018301.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,409 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 200 of 236 1104
LC3Cmax7
Parkinson - cross
LC3Cmax7
Parkinson - cross
1 Q. But there is no way for the videos or the photographs we
2 saw to show that they were there any day prior to October 20th,
3 2005; isn't that right?
4 A. I just don't know how to answer that.
5 Q. Okay.
6 A. That's one of the best questions I've had in 55 years. If
7 I do find out, I'll let you know.
8 Q. Then I'll ask a few more hopefully smart questions.
9 The same thing with the artwork that we saw in the
10 videos and the photographs. The videos and the photographs
11 show what artwork was in that house on October 20th of 2005;
12 yes?
13 A. True.
14 Q. But it would have no way of showing what artwork was there
15 on any day prior to October 20th, 2005?
16 A. I don't see how that would be possible.
17 Q. I'll just ask also about the items in the house apart from
18 the artwork and the photographs, same question. There is no
19 way that the video or the photographs could show what items
20 were in the house prior to that day?
21 A. No, sir, I don't believe science has gotten that far.
22 Q. So bottom line is, we have no idea from what we looked at
23 in your testimony what the house looked like prior to October
24 20th of 2005?
25 A. I certainly don't.
2 saw to show that they were there any day prior to October 20th,
3 2005; isn't that right?
4 A. I just don't know how to answer that.
5 Q. Okay.
6 A. That's one of the best questions I've had in 55 years. If
7 I do find out, I'll let you know.
8 Q. Then I'll ask a few more hopefully smart questions.
9 The same thing with the artwork that we saw in the
10 videos and the photographs. The videos and the photographs
11 show what artwork was in that house on October 20th of 2005;
12 yes?
13 A. True.
14 Q. But it would have no way of showing what artwork was there
15 on any day prior to October 20th, 2005?
16 A. I don't see how that would be possible.
17 Q. I'll just ask also about the items in the house apart from
18 the artwork and the photographs, same question. There is no
19 way that the video or the photographs could show what items
20 were in the house prior to that day?
21 A. No, sir, I don't believe science has gotten that far.
22 Q. So bottom line is, we have no idea from what we looked at
23 in your testimony what the house looked like prior to October
24 20th of 2005?
25 A. I certainly don't.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018301
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document