DOJ-OGR-00013020.jpg
606 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
606 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The judge expresses concern that a witness, Brian, may have been coached during a recent conversation with another person, Jane. A lawyer, Ms. Moe, refutes this by arguing that Brian's testimony is consistent with prior statements he made to the government long before the trial, which are documented in '3500 material'.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, expressing concern about potential witness coaching.
|
| MS. MOE | Lawyer |
Speaker in the transcript, addressing the court's concerns and defending the consistency of a witness's testimony.
|
| Brian | Witness |
Mentioned as a witness for the government whose testimony is being discussed. He allegedly relayed his testimony to t...
|
| Jane |
Mentioned as having a recent conversation with Brian during the trial, which raised concerns about witness coaching.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| the government | government agency |
Mentioned as the entity to whom Brian had relayed the substance of his testimony before the trial.
|
Timeline (4 events)
An unnamed woman gave testimony and later described the experience as unpleasant.
unnamed 'her'
Brian met with the government long before the trial began.
Relationships (2)
They had a recent conversation during the trial which raised concerns of witness coaching.
Brian is a witness for the government, has been on their witness list for some time, and met with them before the trial to relay the substance of his testimony.
Key Quotes (3)
"Needless to say, the point that's concerning is whether she coached him on her responses so that his testimony regarding prior consistent statements would show consistency."Source
— THE COURT
(The judge explaining the core concern about a conversation between two individuals related to the trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00013020.jpg
Quote #1
"On the subject of the prior consistent statement, I would note -- and the 3500 material reflects this -- that Brian had relayed the substance of his testimony to the government and it's memorialized in 3500 long before this conversation happened."Source
— MS. MOE
(A lawyer arguing that a witness's testimony was not recently influenced, as it was consistent with statements made to the government long before the trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00013020.jpg
Quote #2
"And so to the extent there is any suggestion that his testimony is prompted by a recent conversation with Jane during the trial, that's belied by the record here, which is that he has relayed to us those prior consistent statements substantially in advance of the trial."Source
— MS. MOE
(A lawyer refuting the idea that a conversation with Jane influenced Brian's testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00013020.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,487 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 7 of 264 1429
LC7VMAX1
LC7VMAX1
had called him after her testimony and relayed that her
experience wasn't pleasant.
experience wasn't pleasant.
THE COURT: It sounds like maybe more than that it
wasn't pleasant; sounds like part of what was relayed -- that's
not the part that concerns me. Needless to say, the point
that's concerning is whether she coached him on her responses
so that his testimony regarding prior consistent statements
would show consistency. That's, I think, the only --
wasn't pleasant; sounds like part of what was relayed -- that's
not the part that concerns me. Needless to say, the point
that's concerning is whether she coached him on her responses
so that his testimony regarding prior consistent statements
would show consistency. That's, I think, the only --
MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
THE COURT: I'm not sure there's any relevance --
although it's concerning, I'm not sure there's any relevance to
a description of the process is unpleasant or that they did or
didn't like the lawyers and how they were treated.
although it's concerning, I'm not sure there's any relevance to
a description of the process is unpleasant or that they did or
didn't like the lawyers and how they were treated.
MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
On the subject of the prior consistent statement, I
would note -- and the 3500 material reflects this -- that Brian
had relayed the substance of his testimony to the government
and it's memorialized in 3500 long before this conversation
happened. He has been on our witness list for some time; he's
met with the government long before this trial began.
would note -- and the 3500 material reflects this -- that Brian
had relayed the substance of his testimony to the government
and it's memorialized in 3500 long before this conversation
happened. He has been on our witness list for some time; he's
met with the government long before this trial began.
And so to the extent there is any suggestion that his
testimony is prompted by a recent conversation with Jane during
the trial, that's belied by the record here, which is that he
has relayed to us those prior consistent statements
substantially in advance of the trial.
testimony is prompted by a recent conversation with Jane during
the trial, that's belied by the record here, which is that he
has relayed to us those prior consistent statements
substantially in advance of the trial.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013020
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document