HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024706.jpg

1.92 MB

Extraction Summary

0
People
10
Organizations
2
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Investment report / market research report
File Size: 1.92 MB
Summary

This document is page 70 of a December 2017 Cannabis Investment Report by Ackrell Capital, bearing a House Oversight Bates stamp. It details the legal landscape of THC under the Controlled Substances Act (CSA), outlining the history of DEA regulations, the 2004 Ninth Circuit court ruling regarding synthetic vs. natural THC, and federal penalties for violations including asset seizure. The report also discusses the DEA's 2016 policy shift intended to expand registered cannabis cultivators beyond the University of Mississippi's long-standing monopoly, noting that while applications were accepted, no new registrations had been issued at the time of the report.

Timeline (4 events)

1970
Enactment of the CSA; THC listed on Schedule I.
United States
DEA
2003
DEA purportedly amended regulatory definition of THC to include natural occurrences.
United States
DEA
2004
Holding in Hemp Industries Association v. DEA enjoining DEA enforcement of 2003 amendment.
Ninth Circuit
August 2016
DEA announced new policy to increase number of registered cannabis cultivators.
United States
DEA

Locations (2)

Relationships (2)

The site is operated by the University of Mississippi under a contract with the National Institute on Drug Abuse
Ackrell Capital, LLC Membership FINRA / SIPC
Member FINRA / SIPC

Key Quotes (3)

"For nearly 50 years, only one cannabis cultivation site in the United States has operated with the required DEA registration."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024706.jpg
Quote #1
"The DEA has since accepted at least 25 applications for registration but has not issued any new registrations."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024706.jpg
Quote #2
"CSA violations may also result in federal seizure of cash and other assets related to the violations."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024706.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,040 characters)

ACKRELL
CAPITAL
Cannabis Investment Report | December 2017
from being imported into the United States. However, because the production of such non-marijuana
products ordinarily involves possession of the entire cannabis plant, including parts deemed marijuana
under the CSA, the CSA effectively prohibits such production in the United States without DEA
registration.
Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)
In addition to and separate from marijuana’s listing on Schedule I, tetrahydrocannabinol¹ (THC) has
been listed on Schedule I since the CSA’s enactment in 1970. From 1970 until 2003, DEA regulations
defined THC for purposes of its separate Schedule I listing as including only “synthetic equivalents”
of the THC found in the cannabis plant. In 2003, the DEA purportedly amended this regulatory
definition of THC to include both synthetic equivalents of THC and THC occurring naturally in the
cannabis plant. In its 2004 holding in Hemp Industries Association v. DEA, the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the Ninth Circuit enjoined DEA enforcement of this purported amendment and held that the
THC listed separately from marijuana on Schedule I includes only synthetic THC and that any THC
occurring naturally within the cannabis plant is controlled under the CSA only if it falls within the
CSA definition of marijuana.
Penalties for CSA Violations
Federal penalties for violating CSA provisions regarding marijuana or THC include fines and imprison-
ment. CSA violations may also result in federal seizure of cash and other assets related to the violations.
CSA penalties may apply to cannabis businesses that violate the CSA and also to individuals who own
or operate such businesses based on attempt, accomplice, conspiracy and criminal enterprise provisions
included in the CSA.
New DEA Registration Policy
For nearly 50 years, only one cannabis cultivation site in the United States has operated with the
required DEA registration. The site is operated by the University of Mississippi under a contract with
the National Institute on Drug Abuse to supply the country’s entire stock of federally legal cannabis,
which is used exclusively for research. In August 2016, the DEA announced a new policy designed
to increase the number of DEA-registered cannabis cultivators and permit-registered cultivators to
grow cannabis for privately funded commercial drug development projects. The DEA announcement
acknowledged the increasing interest in conducting cannabis research related to commercial pur-
suits, and indicated that the best way to satisfy the increased demand was to increase the number of
DEA-registered cultivators. The DEA has since accepted at least 25 applications for registration but has
not issued any new registrations.
¹CSA Schedule I uses the plural form “tetrahydrocannabinols” to describe a category of substances that includes chemical deriva-
tives and isomers. This report adopts the more commonly used singular form, “tetrahydrocannabinol.”
70
© 2017 Ackrell Capital, LLC | Member FINRA / SIPC
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024706

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document