An email chain from November 2021 between attorney Joe Nascimento and a redacted client. Nascimento alerts the client that a redacted individual (likely close to the client) was subpoenaed in a lawsuit against their ex-husband involving allegations of sex discrimination and battery. The email notes that the plaintiff is attempting to connect the individual to actions taken while working for Jeffrey Epstein and has included the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) in their legal filings.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Joe Nascimento | Sender/Attorney |
Attorney at Amsel Raben Nascimento, PLLC alerting client to legal developments.
|
| Joseph E. Nascimento | Attorney |
Full name listed in signature block.
|
| Epstein | Subject of Allegations |
Mentioned in relation to 'actions while working for Epstein' and factual allegations in a motion.
|
| [Redacted Person A] | Subpoena Recipient |
Was served with a subpoena for a deposition.
|
| [Redacted Person B] | Defendant |
Ex-husband of [Redacted Person A], being sued by a former employee.
|
| [Redacted Former Employee] | Plaintiff |
Suing ex-husband for sex discrimination, battery, and IIED.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Amsel Raben Nascimento, PLLC |
Law firm representing the sender.
|
|
| The Court |
Judicial body handling the motions to quash and reconsider.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address of Amsel Raben Nascimento, PLLC, 4th Floor.
|
"[Redacted] is getting dragged in because they want to connect [Redacted] to [Redacted] actions while working for Epstein."Source
"[Redacted] ex-husband [Redacted] is being sued by a former employee on several grounds including sex discrimination, battery and IIED."Source
"The Plaintiffs have included a copy of the NPA, [Redacted] depo and have made numerous factual allegations related to Epstein in their motion."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,451 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document