An email from Al Seckel to Jeffrey Epstein dated December 16, 2010, detailing efforts to manipulate Google search results (SEO) to suppress negative coverage from the Daily Beast and Huffington Post while promoting positive content. Seckel reports that 'Mike' has successfully removed some 'toxic references' but is stopping work on the project. The email concludes with a request to discuss logistics for 'the island' immediately.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Al Seckel | Sender |
Managing online reputation/SEO for Epstein; coordinates with 'Mike' regarding search results.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Recipient |
Subject of the online reputation management; receiving updates on search engine results.
|
| Mike | SEO Specialist/Contractor |
Person performing the technical work to manipulate search results; noted as 'stopping work now on the project'.
|
| Unidentified Female ('She') | Journalist/Detractor |
Associated with Daily Beast; described as 'a pain and very very persistent'.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Beast |
News outlet appearing in search results that Seckel is trying to remove/suppress.
|
|
| Huffington Post |
News outlet being pushed down in search rankings.
|
|
| Wikipedia |
Top search result in the screenshot provided.
|
|
| The Epstein Foundation |
Mentioned in the Wikipedia search snippet.
|
|
|
Implied platform (screenshot is of Google search results).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Little St. James; mentioned in context of logistics.
|
|
|
Mentioned in Wikipedia snippet as Epstein's birthplace.
|
"Mike managed to knock out daily beast again."Source
"She is a pain and very very persistent."Source
"We managed to push Huffington post down near bottom and is about to be pushed off..."Source
"On the second page, we have replaced 8 toxic references with good ones..."Source
"Mike, however, is stopping work now on the project."Source
"We need to talk about island asap, as they are bugging me for logistics."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,447 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document